Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57121 - 57130 of 68259 for law.

[PDF] State v. Ramon R. Rodriguez
, narrowly focused stop that is contemplated by the law. But if a person agrees to go with the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7263 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
on a misapprehension of the record and the law. ¶6 The criminal complaint in this matter was filed on November 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62865 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Daniel H. Frasch
that he received considerably less than the maximum prison time allowed by law, caused the court to defer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10272 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Carlos A. Merino
statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law that we review independently. See id. at 137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6261 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 338 (holding that Wisconsin law “bars a claim for dual credit where the defendant has already
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450623 - 2021-11-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
No. 2021AP647-CR 4 remain good law, and establish that he is entitled to sentence credit for his time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=496030 - 2022-03-17

John M. O'Neill v. Indian Hills First Addition Association, Inc.
. These fees included researching the facts and law relating to the claim and correspondence with O’Neill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13270 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 17, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
preclusion, claim preclusion, or law of the case. This violates Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(3). Failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27785 - 2007-01-16

_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44699 - 2009-12-14

COURT OF APPEALS
not required to answer whether counsel’s strategy was correct, the Jacob court observed “that certain law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83462 - 2012-06-11