Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57141 - 57150 of 68271 for law.
Search results 57141 - 57150 of 68271 for law.
State v. Kevin L. Guibord
. Whether Guibord's double jeopardy rights were violated presents a question of law this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10360 - 2005-03-31
. Whether Guibord's double jeopardy rights were violated presents a question of law this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10360 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for additional medical expenses. At the hearing, an administrative law judge denied benefits for additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26624 - 2006-10-02
for additional medical expenses. At the hearing, an administrative law judge denied benefits for additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26624 - 2006-10-02
COURT OF APPEALS
has been placed in jeopardy twice for the same offense is a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142822 - 2015-06-09
has been placed in jeopardy twice for the same offense is a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142822 - 2015-06-09
State v. Robert J. Barnes
of whether a set of facts constitutes a “new factor” for sentencing purposes presents a question of law which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13395 - 2005-03-31
of whether a set of facts constitutes a “new factor” for sentencing purposes presents a question of law which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13395 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
October Table of unpublished opinions
of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39 - 2017-09-20
of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Shirley A. Pratsch v. Robert M. Pratsch
not be filed by facsimile transmission. An express mail envelope from the Edina law firm arrived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10312 - 2017-09-20
not be filed by facsimile transmission. An express mail envelope from the Edina law firm arrived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10312 - 2017-09-20
State v. Dennis C. Tevik
information to an accused driver are questions of law we review de novo. See State v. Hagaman, 133 Wis.2d 381
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9841 - 2005-03-31
information to an accused driver are questions of law we review de novo. See State v. Hagaman, 133 Wis.2d 381
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9841 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there was no breach, we affirm. Whether the State violated the terms of a plea agreement is a question of law we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499827 - 2022-03-30
there was no breach, we affirm. Whether the State violated the terms of a plea agreement is a question of law we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499827 - 2022-03-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
license had been revoked. After a hearing, an administrative law judge (ALJ) issued a proposed order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108226 - 2017-09-21
license had been revoked. After a hearing, an administrative law judge (ALJ) issued a proposed order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108226 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to law; (3) its action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235237 - 2019-02-15
to law; (3) its action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235237 - 2019-02-15