Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57161 - 57170 of 83976 for simple case search.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Cl...
and shell casing established that Demery had been shot by the gun found at Starkweather’s feet. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28093 - 2007-02-12

State v. Derrick Emerson
to this case. The court sentenced Emerson to three years in prison. Emerson moved for reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6737 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert A. Ruzkowski
that its duty as a judge is to independently evaluate each case. It commenced its sentencing decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20279 - 2005-11-22

State v. Thomas Alan Dhein
. was dismissed along with a sexual assault charge in a separate case. Dhein executed a plea questionnaire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12861 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Rule Order
, that the fee at issue is not imposed in such cases. The court discussed whether to conduct a public hearing
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115257 - 2017-09-21

Gary P. Ellis v. Sawyer County Board of Appeals
that the Ellises performed more than routine maintenance, which is the main issue in this case. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6311 - 2005-03-31

Brown County v. April O.
pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 48.315(2), under the undisputed facts of this case, presents a legal question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3418 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Pauline B. Raemisch v. The City of Madison
to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id. at 368, 570 N.W.2d at 617
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13228 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James J. Krispin
The relevant facts are undisputed. The present case arose from allegations that Krispin, a supervisor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4293 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
and voluntarily after receipt of Miranda warnings and was, therefore, admissible in the State’s case-in-chief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32517 - 2008-04-28