Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5721 - 5730 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5721 - 5730 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
State v. Bradley Cornelius
of statutory interpretation, which this court decides de novo. Doyen, 185 Wis.2d at 640, 518 N.W.2d at 323
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13551 - 2005-03-31
of statutory interpretation, which this court decides de novo. Doyen, 185 Wis.2d at 640, 518 N.W.2d at 323
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13551 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
To: Hon. John A. Des Jardins Circuit Court Judge Outagamie County Courthouse 320 S. Walnut St
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144555 - 2017-09-21
To: Hon. John A. Des Jardins Circuit Court Judge Outagamie County Courthouse 320 S. Walnut St
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144555 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous standard. Id. Second, we apply de novo review to the application of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73219 - 2014-09-15
erroneous standard. Id. Second, we apply de novo review to the application of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73219 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that we review de novo. See State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. “[I]f
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227135 - 2018-11-13
that we review de novo. See State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. “[I]f
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227135 - 2018-11-13
[PDF]
State v. Camara Tyler
a question of law that this court decides de novo. State v. Griffin, 183 Wis.2d 327, 331, 515 N.W.2d 535
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9200 - 2017-09-19
a question of law that this court decides de novo. State v. Griffin, 183 Wis.2d 327, 331, 515 N.W.2d 535
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9200 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81993 - 2014-09-15
court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81993 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael V.H.
to the circuit court for further consideration because he was denied his statutory right to a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3362 - 2017-09-19
to the circuit court for further consideration because he was denied his statutory right to a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3362 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶14. ¶6 This court resolved Ellis’s appeal from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36480 - 2009-05-18
a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶14. ¶6 This court resolved Ellis’s appeal from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36480 - 2009-05-18
Sunburst IV Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
on costs. Under Wis. Stat. § 227.485(6) (2001-02),[1] the circuit court has authority to make a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5664 - 2005-03-31
on costs. Under Wis. Stat. § 227.485(6) (2001-02),[1] the circuit court has authority to make a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5664 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peter Bekersky
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7779 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7779 - 2005-03-31