Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5721 - 5730 of 30150 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5721 - 5730 of 30150 for consulta de causas.
CA Blank Order
establishes a new sentencing factor is a question of law that we review de novo. Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d 53, ¶33
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103246 - 2013-10-17
establishes a new sentencing factor is a question of law that we review de novo. Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d 53, ¶33
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103246 - 2013-10-17
Sunburst IV Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
on costs. Under Wis. Stat. § 227.485(6) (2001-02),[1] the circuit court has authority to make a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5664 - 2005-03-31
on costs. Under Wis. Stat. § 227.485(6) (2001-02),[1] the circuit court has authority to make a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5664 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the procedural bar imposed by § 974.06 and Escalona- Naranjo is a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854735 - 2024-10-01
the procedural bar imposed by § 974.06 and Escalona- Naranjo is a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854735 - 2024-10-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the procedural bar imposed by § 974.06 and Escalona- Naranjo is a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854735 - 2024-10-01
the procedural bar imposed by § 974.06 and Escalona- Naranjo is a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854735 - 2024-10-01
State v. Samantha H.
presents a question of statutory interpretation, a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11547 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of statutory interpretation, a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11547 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David J. Geisler v. Marc S. Baldwin
questions of law that we review de novo. See Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Owen, 191 Wis. 2d 744, 747, 530 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5618 - 2017-09-19
questions of law that we review de novo. See Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Owen, 191 Wis. 2d 744, 747, 530 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5618 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Richard Boho
a phone call violates the “no contact” condition of bail presents a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11612 - 2017-09-19
a phone call violates the “no contact” condition of bail presents a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11612 - 2017-09-19
State v. Leporld L. Miller
a question of law, subject to our de novo review. State v. Dwyer, 181 Wis.2d 826, 836, 512 N.W.2d 233, 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8511 - 2005-03-31
a question of law, subject to our de novo review. State v. Dwyer, 181 Wis.2d 826, 836, 512 N.W.2d 233, 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8511 - 2005-03-31
Jeffrey A. Librande v. Allstate Insurance Company
. ¶2 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7018 - 2005-03-31
. ¶2 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7018 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ryan Fontecchio
from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15658 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15658 - 2005-03-31