Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5721 - 5730 of 50107 for our.
Search results 5721 - 5730 of 50107 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
] Nienke claims he had a due process right to inspect the blood sample. ¶9 Our supreme court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26788 - 2006-10-16
] Nienke claims he had a due process right to inspect the blood sample. ¶9 Our supreme court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26788 - 2006-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and an order No. 2017AP237-CR 2 denying his motion for resentencing. 1 Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204999 - 2017-12-13
, and an order No. 2017AP237-CR 2 denying his motion for resentencing. 1 Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204999 - 2017-12-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights form and plea hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279090 - 2020-08-18
. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights form and plea hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279090 - 2020-08-18
State v. Trempealeau County Board of Adjustment
us is whether the board erred by granting the variances. ¶6 Our role on certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15852 - 2005-03-31
us is whether the board erred by granting the variances. ¶6 Our role on certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15852 - 2005-03-31
City of Eau Claire v. Christopher A. Jerram
). In Braunsdorf, our supreme court concluded that courts have no inherent authority to dismiss a criminal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20984 - 2006-01-17
). In Braunsdorf, our supreme court concluded that courts have no inherent authority to dismiss a criminal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20984 - 2006-01-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891839 - 2024-12-19
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891839 - 2024-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and in favor of Jerome and Dorothea Saavedra. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017718 - 2025-09-30
and in favor of Jerome and Dorothea Saavedra. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017718 - 2025-09-30
[PDF]
State v. Bernard W. Harris
with the stipulation and the brief. But the record does not include such a motion. We have taken our facts from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2757 - 2017-09-19
with the stipulation and the brief. But the record does not include such a motion. We have taken our facts from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2757 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Thomas also contends that we should grant a new trial in the interest of justice. We disagree. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61073 - 2011-03-15
Thomas also contends that we should grant a new trial in the interest of justice. We disagree. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61073 - 2011-03-15
City of Madison v. Cynthia J. Vernon
court’s reconsideration order, what remained after our remand was the circuit court’s order reversing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16113 - 2005-03-31
court’s reconsideration order, what remained after our remand was the circuit court’s order reversing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16113 - 2005-03-31