Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5721 - 5730 of 50107 for our.
Search results 5721 - 5730 of 50107 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Because case No. 2018CF32 is a revocation sentence, our review in that case is limited. An appeal from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540653 - 2022-07-08
Because case No. 2018CF32 is a revocation sentence, our review in that case is limited. An appeal from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540653 - 2022-07-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
should grant a new trial in the interest of justice. We disagree. Our discretionary reversal power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61073 - 2014-09-15
should grant a new trial in the interest of justice. We disagree. Our discretionary reversal power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61073 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103691 - 2013-11-04
was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103691 - 2013-11-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on remand, the court asked that we reconsider our acceptance of the State’s concession that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253589 - 2020-02-06
on remand, the court asked that we reconsider our acceptance of the State’s concession that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253589 - 2020-02-06
[PDF]
State v. Kendrick C. East III
that “we’re willing to waive the intrastate detainer if we can receive our 90-day speedy trial request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6365 - 2017-09-19
that “we’re willing to waive the intrastate detainer if we can receive our 90-day speedy trial request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6365 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the records, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218892 - 2018-09-07
. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the records, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218892 - 2018-09-07
[PDF]
State v. Marvin D. Doyle
analysis of the issues and raising additional issues. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9464 - 2017-09-19
analysis of the issues and raising additional issues. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9464 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a no-merit report under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14). 1 Based on our review of the record, we reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156748 - 2017-09-21
a no-merit report under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14). 1 Based on our review of the record, we reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156748 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. As to the first issue, our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire/waiver of rights form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781130 - 2024-04-02
. As to the first issue, our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire/waiver of rights form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781130 - 2024-04-02
[PDF]
WI 122
in light of our decision and the request of the parties that further proceedings be conducted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27087 - 2014-09-15
in light of our decision and the request of the parties that further proceedings be conducted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27087 - 2014-09-15