Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5721 - 5730 of 39047 for probate forms.
Search results 5721 - 5730 of 39047 for probate forms.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after revocation of his probation and the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132114 - 2017-09-21
appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after revocation of his probation and the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132114 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
after revocation of his probation and the circuit court’s denial of his postconviction motion relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132114 - 2014-12-22
after revocation of his probation and the circuit court’s denial of his postconviction motion relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132114 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Robert R. Orlebeke
and nine years’ extended supervision. The imposed sentence was stayed in favor of six years’ probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6697 - 2017-09-20
and nine years’ extended supervision. The imposed sentence was stayed in favor of six years’ probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6697 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Vanessa Russell
the imposed conditions of probation violated her constitutional rights; and (3) whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4548 - 2017-09-20
the imposed conditions of probation violated her constitutional rights; and (3) whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4548 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
H. Elaine Stipetich v. William J. Grosshans
as a probation and parole officer in the Janesville office of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections’ (DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15443 - 2017-09-21
as a probation and parole officer in the Janesville office of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections’ (DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15443 - 2017-09-21
H. Elaine Stipetich v. William J. Grosshans
. Background ¶3 In 1983, Stipetich began working as a probation and parole officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15443 - 2005-03-31
. Background ¶3 In 1983, Stipetich began working as a probation and parole officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15443 - 2005-03-31
State v. David W. Oakley
. Under such circumstances, the probation condition is not overbroad. Furthermore, the probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17588 - 2005-03-31
. Under such circumstances, the probation condition is not overbroad. Furthermore, the probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17588 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
no contest. At sentencing, the defense and the State jointly recommended three years’ probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56614 - 2010-11-16
no contest. At sentencing, the defense and the State jointly recommended three years’ probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56614 - 2010-11-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the defense and the State jointly recommended three years’ probation. An independent sentencing report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56614 - 2014-09-15
, the defense and the State jointly recommended three years’ probation. An independent sentencing report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56614 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 29
and eighteen months’ extended supervision, with three years’ probation and six months’ conditional jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162552 - 2017-09-21
and eighteen months’ extended supervision, with three years’ probation and six months’ conditional jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162552 - 2017-09-21