Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5721 - 5730 of 64449 for records/1000.
Search results 5721 - 5730 of 64449 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213860 - 2018-06-06
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213860 - 2018-06-06
[PDF]
Allen C. Orth v. Walworth County
argued that the parcel was a parcel of record prior to the adoption of the Walworth County Zoning Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15475 - 2017-09-21
argued that the parcel was a parcel of record prior to the adoption of the Walworth County Zoning Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15475 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201344 - 2017-11-07
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201344 - 2017-11-07
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon review of the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92328 - 2014-09-15
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon review of the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92328 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the record on appeal is unclear regarding credit for the deposit. We therefore reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
, and the record on appeal is unclear regarding credit for the deposit. We therefore reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218704 - 2018-09-12
. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218704 - 2018-09-12
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140093 - 2015-04-20
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140093 - 2015-04-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=424004 - 2021-09-15
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=424004 - 2021-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not responded. Upon reviewing the entire Record and the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1083398 - 2026-03-04
not responded. Upon reviewing the entire Record and the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1083398 - 2026-03-04