Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57251 - 57260 of 83989 for simple case search.
Search results 57251 - 57260 of 83989 for simple case search.
State v. Gary Cembrowski
, Cembrowski acknowledged: I have read ... the criminal complaint and the information in this case, and I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12111 - 2005-03-31
, Cembrowski acknowledged: I have read ... the criminal complaint and the information in this case, and I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12111 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
again affirmed the orders in Critton’s case. See State v. Critton, No. 01-3254, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28922 - 2007-05-07
again affirmed the orders in Critton’s case. See State v. Critton, No. 01-3254, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28922 - 2007-05-07
CA Blank Order
and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96732 - 2013-05-08
and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96732 - 2013-05-08
Mark Terpstra v. Joseph Van Aelstyn
The Terpstras point to case law under which some real estate sellers have a duty to disclose conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7667 - 2005-03-31
The Terpstras point to case law under which some real estate sellers have a duty to disclose conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7667 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cleatus L. Marney, Jr.
Marney’s request that the case be remanded for resentencing. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16022 - 2005-03-31
Marney’s request that the case be remanded for resentencing. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16022 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. Id., ¶73. ¶8 The two lines of cases have different standards for whether an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43370 - 2009-11-16
motion. Id., ¶73. ¶8 The two lines of cases have different standards for whether an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43370 - 2009-11-16
Dennis C. Marth v. Judy P. Smith
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3031-W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14672 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3031-W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14672 - 2005-03-31
Village of Menomonee Falls v. Thomas O'Neill
., 122 Wis.2d 158, 166, 361 N.W.2d 673, 677 (1985). In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11859 - 2005-03-31
., 122 Wis.2d 158, 166, 361 N.W.2d 673, 677 (1985). In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11859 - 2005-03-31
Carl Rucker v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
7, 2000, moved to vacate the judgment and reopen the case. While Rucker opposed the motion, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2861 - 2005-03-31
7, 2000, moved to vacate the judgment and reopen the case. While Rucker opposed the motion, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2861 - 2005-03-31
County of Jefferson v. David W. Demler II
from a judgment convicting him of following too closely and reckless driving. His case was originally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2694 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment convicting him of following too closely and reckless driving. His case was originally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2694 - 2005-03-31