Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57271 - 57280 of 61722 for judgment.
Search results 57271 - 57280 of 61722 for judgment.
COURT OF APPEALS
presided over the jury trial, admitted the challenged evidence, and entered the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119568 - 2014-08-18
presided over the jury trial, admitted the challenged evidence, and entered the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119568 - 2014-08-18
COURT OF APPEALS
, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62851 - 2011-04-13
, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62851 - 2011-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS
the Judgment of Dismissal/Acquittal, which specified three read-in charges rather than two. In addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34834 - 2008-12-09
the Judgment of Dismissal/Acquittal, which specified three read-in charges rather than two. In addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34834 - 2008-12-09
[PDF]
Mark Taylor v. Daniel Bertrand
and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence was such that the committee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15376 - 2017-09-21
and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence was such that the committee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15376 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shulbert Z. Williams
the judgment of reasonable people concerning what is right and proper under the circumstances.” Ocanas v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2812 - 2017-09-19
the judgment of reasonable people concerning what is right and proper under the circumstances.” Ocanas v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2812 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the judgment of conviction. State v. Ellis, No. 2003AP1680-CRNM, unpublished slip op. (WI App June 22, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41323 - 2014-09-15
the judgment of conviction. State v. Ellis, No. 2003AP1680-CRNM, unpublished slip op. (WI App June 22, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41323 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” that impaired his “judgment and capacity to recognize reality” and that affected his “ability to perform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217151 - 2018-08-07
” that impaired his “judgment and capacity to recognize reality” and that affected his “ability to perform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217151 - 2018-08-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). The concern is that a motion for reconsideration not be used to extend the time to appeal from a judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908197 - 2025-02-05
). The concern is that a motion for reconsideration not be used to extend the time to appeal from a judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908197 - 2025-02-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Counsel filed a no-merit report, to which Stibbe did not respond, and this court affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811440 - 2024-06-12
. Counsel filed a no-merit report, to which Stibbe did not respond, and this court affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811440 - 2024-06-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hearing after the close of testimony. The State moved for judgment on the petition based on laches
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240409 - 2019-05-06
hearing after the close of testimony. The State moved for judgment on the petition based on laches
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240409 - 2019-05-06