Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5731 - 5740 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5731 - 5740 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
were alleged in the motion is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion presents
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226402 - 2018-11-01
were alleged in the motion is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion presents
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226402 - 2018-11-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the law that we review de novo.” See id. (one set of italics omitted). It is undisputed that Marion did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248032 - 2019-10-02
of the law that we review de novo.” See id. (one set of italics omitted). It is undisputed that Marion did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248032 - 2019-10-02
State v. Troy A. Solomon
for this court’s de novo review. See State v. Griffin, 183 Wis. 2d 327, 331, 515 N.W.2d 535 (Ct. App. 1994). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16036 - 2005-03-31
for this court’s de novo review. See State v. Griffin, 183 Wis. 2d 327, 331, 515 N.W.2d 535 (Ct. App. 1994). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16036 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81993 - 2014-09-15
court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81993 - 2014-09-15
Walworth County Department of Health & Human Services v. Carl H.
requiring statutory interpretation, our review is de novo. We understand this case to be controlled by Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3024 - 2005-03-31
requiring statutory interpretation, our review is de novo. We understand this case to be controlled by Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3024 - 2005-03-31
State v. Wua Xiong
). Whether the defendant has shown the existence of a new factor is a question of law we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13036 - 2005-03-31
). Whether the defendant has shown the existence of a new factor is a question of law we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13036 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
responsibility.” Id., ¶36. “The initial decision on joinder is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06
responsibility.” Id., ¶36. “The initial decision on joinder is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS
-two percent likelihood of re-offense, reducing the likelihood to thirty percent is de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87423 - 2012-09-24
-two percent likelihood of re-offense, reducing the likelihood to thirty percent is de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87423 - 2012-09-24
[PDF]
Nazir I. Al-Mujaahid v. City of Milwaukee
The issue is one of statutory construction—a question of law which we consider de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15038 - 2017-09-21
The issue is one of statutory construction—a question of law which we consider de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15038 - 2017-09-21
John L. Dye, Jr. v. WRC Program Review Committee
an order of the circuit court for Dane County: robert de chambeau, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6759 - 2005-03-31
an order of the circuit court for Dane County: robert de chambeau, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6759 - 2005-03-31