Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57311 - 57320 of 61823 for judgment.
Search results 57311 - 57320 of 61823 for judgment.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1)(a) (stating that a final judgment or order “[e]ntered in accordance with [WIS. STAT. §] 806.06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622248 - 2023-02-14
(1)(a) (stating that a final judgment or order “[e]ntered in accordance with [WIS. STAT. §] 806.06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622248 - 2023-02-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
in this case. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. By the Court.—Order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31109 - 2014-09-15
in this case. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. By the Court.—Order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31109 - 2014-09-15
Eau Claire County Department of Human Services v. Sherrinda M.
and express statutory authority to reverse a judgment and remit a case for a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6650 - 2005-03-31
and express statutory authority to reverse a judgment and remit a case for a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6650 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
as to represent its will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence before the board was such that it might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141859 - 2015-05-18
as to represent its will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence before the board was such that it might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141859 - 2015-05-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). The concern is that a motion for reconsideration not be used to extend the time to appeal from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908197 - 2025-02-05
). The concern is that a motion for reconsideration not be used to extend the time to appeal from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908197 - 2025-02-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to enter judgment accordingly. WIS. STAT. § 842.07; LaRene, 133 Wis. 2d at 118 n.1. Conversely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90891 - 2014-09-15
to enter judgment accordingly. WIS. STAT. § 842.07; LaRene, 133 Wis. 2d at 118 n.1. Conversely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90891 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Jasmine C. Daniels appeals her judgment of conviction entered after she pled guilty to neglecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883007 - 2024-11-26
). Jasmine C. Daniels appeals her judgment of conviction entered after she pled guilty to neglecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883007 - 2024-11-26
COURT OF APPEALS
, this court affirmed the judgments of conviction. See State v. Sharp, Nos. 2002AP2114-CRNM & 2002AP2115-CRNM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123832 - 2014-10-13
, this court affirmed the judgments of conviction. See State v. Sharp, Nos. 2002AP2114-CRNM & 2002AP2115-CRNM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123832 - 2014-10-13
Anita Novak v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
will and not its judgment, and (4) the evidence was such that the commission might reasonably make the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2325 - 2005-03-31
will and not its judgment, and (4) the evidence was such that the commission might reasonably make the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2325 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the motion to dismiss one conviction and denied the remainder of Earsley’s motion. An amended judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237982 - 2019-03-21
the motion to dismiss one conviction and denied the remainder of Earsley’s motion. An amended judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237982 - 2019-03-21