Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57331 - 57340 of 83653 for case search.
Search results 57331 - 57340 of 83653 for case search.
State v. Shoua Y.
by preponderance of evidence). In this case, the court permitted the State to present evidence on prosecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10689 - 2005-03-31
by preponderance of evidence). In this case, the court permitted the State to present evidence on prosecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10689 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. was interviewed by social worker Kelly Oleson. ¶4 The case was re-investigated beginning in June 2010, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213239 - 2018-07-12
. was interviewed by social worker Kelly Oleson. ¶4 The case was re-investigated beginning in June 2010, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213239 - 2018-07-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an answer to the garnishment complaint; (2) the “reasonably prudent factors” set forth in case law; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052078 - 2025-12-18
an answer to the garnishment complaint; (2) the “reasonably prudent factors” set forth in case law; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052078 - 2025-12-18
John Nierengarten v. Lutheran Social Services of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan, Inc.
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96‑2187
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11186 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96‑2187
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11186 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the property. There was a previous decision in Winnebago No. 2024AP343 8 County case number 21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965303 - 2025-06-04
on the property. There was a previous decision in Winnebago No. 2024AP343 8 County case number 21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965303 - 2025-06-04
State v. Terron Napper
the Nappers' arguments and would affirm the judgments and orders. The joint concurring opinion in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8364 - 2005-03-31
the Nappers' arguments and would affirm the judgments and orders. The joint concurring opinion in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8364 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
statutory factors to the facts of the case. Id. ¶8 “A circuit court erroneously exercises its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109568 - 2014-03-26
statutory factors to the facts of the case. Id. ¶8 “A circuit court erroneously exercises its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109568 - 2014-03-26
[PDF]
MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. The State of Wisconsin
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8857 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8857 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Kathleen Krejci v. John Krejci
2003 WI App 160 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-3376-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5994 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 160 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-3376-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5994 - 2017-09-19
State v. Peter C. Ramuta
2003 WI App 80 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-1431-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5296 - 2005-03-31
2003 WI App 80 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-1431-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5296 - 2005-03-31