Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57381 - 57390 of 61823 for judgment.
Search results 57381 - 57390 of 61823 for judgment.
COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed the judgments of conviction: State v. Andre Avery, 215 Wis. 2d 45, 571 N.W.2d 907 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50732 - 2010-06-07
affirmed the judgments of conviction: State v. Andre Avery, 215 Wis. 2d 45, 571 N.W.2d 907 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50732 - 2010-06-07
[PDF]
Charles H. Johnson v. City of Greenfield Board of Review
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable so as to represent its will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18452 - 2017-09-21
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable so as to represent its will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18452 - 2017-09-21
Payne & Dolan, Inc. v. Dane County
their will and not their judgment, and (4) the evidence was such that they could reasonably make the order or determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15804 - 2005-03-31
their will and not their judgment, and (4) the evidence was such that they could reasonably make the order or determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15804 - 2005-03-31
Eau Claire County v. Robert P.
to be served upon a party … and every written notice, appearance, demand, offer of judgment, undertaking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15161 - 2005-03-31
to be served upon a party … and every written notice, appearance, demand, offer of judgment, undertaking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15161 - 2005-03-31
John Smith v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
.2d 169, 173-74 (1983); § 227.57(6), Stats. A reviewing court may not substitute its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14702 - 2005-03-31
.2d 169, 173-74 (1983); § 227.57(6), Stats. A reviewing court may not substitute its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14702 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 10, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
, we may not substitute our judgment for the jury’s; rather, we determine whether the award is within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114086 - 2014-06-09
, we may not substitute our judgment for the jury’s; rather, we determine whether the award is within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114086 - 2014-06-09
[PDF]
Frontsheet
action having been taken against him until late May 2013, when the publication of the final judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143347 - 2017-09-21
action having been taken against him until late May 2013, when the publication of the final judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143347 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Nikola P. Kostich
in the amount of $3200, plus post- judgment interest, provided that if the restitution is not made within
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18713 - 2017-09-21
in the amount of $3200, plus post- judgment interest, provided that if the restitution is not made within
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18713 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
default judgment against Stephanek for $1177.22. It suffices to say that Stephanek felt that Kohn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132838 - 2017-09-21
default judgment against Stephanek for $1177.22. It suffices to say that Stephanek felt that Kohn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132838 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
its will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence before the board was such that it might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141859 - 2017-09-21
its will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence before the board was such that it might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141859 - 2017-09-21