Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5741 - 5750 of 36014 for affidavit of mailing.
Search results 5741 - 5750 of 36014 for affidavit of mailing.
[PDF]
State v. Charles Edward Hennings
was ineffective when he submitted the investigative report instead of an affidavit from Buchanan because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19667 - 2017-09-21
was ineffective when he submitted the investigative report instead of an affidavit from Buchanan because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19667 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, states via affidavit that he was actually the owner of the cell phone that James had claimed was his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204240 - 2017-12-05
, states via affidavit that he was actually the owner of the cell phone that James had claimed was his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204240 - 2017-12-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction motion seeking a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, in the form of an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235442 - 2019-02-21
a postconviction motion seeking a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, in the form of an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235442 - 2019-02-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 802.05 sanctions. Her supporting affidavit recited that she could not file corporate and payroll tax
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41678 - 2009-10-06
. § 802.05 sanctions. Her supporting affidavit recited that she could not file corporate and payroll tax
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41678 - 2009-10-06
Loretta M. Gilmeister v. Eugene Zdroik & Sons, Inc.
The next document filed with the court after the judgment entered on January 5, 1993, was an “Affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2119 - 2005-03-31
The next document filed with the court after the judgment entered on January 5, 1993, was an “Affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2119 - 2005-03-31
Clara M. Rolland v. County of Milwaukee
of their motion for summary judgment, Milwaukee Transport and the County submitted an affidavit executed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15771 - 2005-03-31
of their motion for summary judgment, Milwaukee Transport and the County submitted an affidavit executed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15771 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
underlying this appeal in which Jones raised a claim of newly discovered evidence based on two affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967734 - 2025-06-10
underlying this appeal in which Jones raised a claim of newly discovered evidence based on two affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967734 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
The affidavit Brill’s counsel filed in support of the motion averred that faxes would not go through due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41678 - 2014-09-15
The affidavit Brill’s counsel filed in support of the motion averred that faxes would not go through due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41678 - 2014-09-15
Kathy Delamater v. Search Beyond Adventures, Inc.
. ¶10 We next turn to the affidavits and other proof submitted by Search Beyond to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16221 - 2005-03-31
. ¶10 We next turn to the affidavits and other proof submitted by Search Beyond to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16221 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108338 - 2017-09-21
party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108338 - 2017-09-21