Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5741 - 5750 of 64843 for records.

State v. Donald F. Greeno
concluded that these possible issues lack arguable merit. Based upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8811 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. He has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245184 - 2019-08-21

[PDF] State v. Jesse R.J.
2 conclude that the record shows the requisite “good cause” for a court to grant a continuance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12283 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
are not cognizable under coram nobis, and even if they were, his substantive claims are belied by the record in each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28987 - 2007-06-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and a subsequent petition for a writ of error. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618565 - 2023-02-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051789 - 2025-12-23

State v. Titus Graham
it inaccurately characterized his criminal history. Although Graham had no prior criminal record, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6688 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109722 - 2014-04-01

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197667 - 2017-10-11

[PDF] State v. Donald F. Greeno
independent review of the record, we conclude that Attorney Frantz's analysis of the issues is correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8810 - 2017-09-19