Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5741 - 5750 of 17379 for search wicourts.gov.
Search results 5741 - 5750 of 17379 for search wicourts.gov.
State v. Linda Lacey
search warrants; and (6) her trial counsel was ineffective.[1] ¶2 Although we reject Lacey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6992 - 2005-03-31
search warrants; and (6) her trial counsel was ineffective.[1] ¶2 Although we reject Lacey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6992 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Terrance J. Trammell
) illegally searched his sister’s home. We affirm.2 I. BACKGROUND ¶2 Trammell was a back seat passenger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16023 - 2017-09-21
) illegally searched his sister’s home. We affirm.2 I. BACKGROUND ¶2 Trammell was a back seat passenger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16023 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. Logan
gave them permission to search the house. Groce also told the court that while he was talking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6854 - 2017-09-20
gave them permission to search the house. Groce also told the court that while he was talking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6854 - 2017-09-20
State v. Terrance J. Trammell
) lacked probable cause to arrest him; and (3) illegally searched his sister’s home. We affirm.[2] I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16023 - 2005-03-31
) lacked probable cause to arrest him; and (3) illegally searched his sister’s home. We affirm.[2] I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16023 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher L. Logan
and she gave them permission to search the house. Groce also told the court that while he was talking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6854 - 2005-03-31
and she gave them permission to search the house. Groce also told the court that while he was talking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6854 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
hearing on his claim that the affidavit supporting the search warrant omitted critical information; he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34875 - 2014-09-15
hearing on his claim that the affidavit supporting the search warrant omitted critical information; he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34875 - 2014-09-15
WI App 65 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP852-CR Complete Title ...
that the blood draw was an unlawful search, including that Wis. Stat. § 343.305(3)(ar)2. is unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112885 - 2014-06-24
that the blood draw was an unlawful search, including that Wis. Stat. § 343.305(3)(ar)2. is unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112885 - 2014-06-24
[PDF]
WI APP 65
that the blood draw was an unlawful search, including that WIS. STAT. § 343.305(3)(ar)2. is unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112885 - 2017-09-21
that the blood draw was an unlawful search, including that WIS. STAT. § 343.305(3)(ar)2. is unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112885 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for the truth in the affidavit supporting the request for a search warrant. ¶3 When challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31089 - 2007-12-05
for the truth in the affidavit supporting the request for a search warrant. ¶3 When challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31089 - 2007-12-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
for a search warrant. ¶3 When challenging the veracity of statements in support of a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31089 - 2014-09-15
for a search warrant. ¶3 When challenging the veracity of statements in support of a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31089 - 2014-09-15