Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57441 - 57450 of 69855 for as he.
Search results 57441 - 57450 of 69855 for as he.
COURT OF APPEALS
of David’s marriage or family, as shown by the marital purpose statements he signed. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128650 - 2014-11-18
of David’s marriage or family, as shown by the marital purpose statements he signed. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128650 - 2014-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Because he had been previously convicted of a felony, Brown was subject to a four-year penalty enhancer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
. Because he had been previously convicted of a felony, Brown was subject to a four-year penalty enhancer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals from his judgment of conviction, entered after he pled guilty to second-degree reckless homicide
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=626771 - 2023-02-28
appeals from his judgment of conviction, entered after he pled guilty to second-degree reckless homicide
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=626771 - 2023-02-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the nature of the charges and the range of punishments he faced, the constitutional rights he waived
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959457 - 2025-05-22
of the nature of the charges and the range of punishments he faced, the constitutional rights he waived
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959457 - 2025-05-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Because he had been previously convicted of a felony, Brown was subject to a four-year penalty enhancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
. Because he had been previously convicted of a felony, Brown was subject to a four-year penalty enhancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
Jefferson County v. Jesse A. Marcelle
he consented to that analysis. See State v. Callaway, 106 Wis. 2d 503, 510, 317 N.W.2d 428 (1982
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4053 - 2005-03-31
he consented to that analysis. See State v. Callaway, 106 Wis. 2d 503, 510, 317 N.W.2d 428 (1982
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4053 - 2005-03-31
Dorothy A. Wessel v. Emmett D. Wessel
former wife, Dorothy A. Wessel. He argues that in reducing rather than terminating support, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11645 - 2005-03-31
former wife, Dorothy A. Wessel. He argues that in reducing rather than terminating support, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11645 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
against the Wisconsin Department of Administration and Batchelder, claiming he negligently operated his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139402 - 2015-04-06
against the Wisconsin Department of Administration and Batchelder, claiming he negligently operated his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139402 - 2015-04-06
[PDF]
State v. Gerald L. Larson
to support an in camera review. We conclude that he did and affirm the circuit court’s order. ¶2 Larson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18500 - 2017-09-21
to support an in camera review. We conclude that he did and affirm the circuit court’s order. ¶2 Larson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18500 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Robert A. Kerbell v. Otter Creek Builders, LLC
on Tainter’s deposition. He was the only witness deposed. Based on that deposition, Kerbell maintained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2104 - 2017-09-19
on Tainter’s deposition. He was the only witness deposed. Based on that deposition, Kerbell maintained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2104 - 2017-09-19