Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5751 - 5760 of 65362 for or b.
Search results 5751 - 5760 of 65362 for or b.
Sol Coleman, Jr. v. Michael Sullivan
and accompanying certified copy of Coleman’s trust fund accounts statement, see § 814.29(1m)(b)2, Stats., reveal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14472 - 2005-03-31
and accompanying certified copy of Coleman’s trust fund accounts statement, see § 814.29(1m)(b)2, Stats., reveal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14472 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
not exceed ten years, WIS. STAT. § 973.01(2)(b)3., and there was no maximum term of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35970 - 2014-09-15
not exceed ten years, WIS. STAT. § 973.01(2)(b)3., and there was no maximum term of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35970 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Sheila K. LaFortune
contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.09(1)(b). 1 LaFortune also appeals the order denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6999 - 2017-09-20
contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.09(1)(b). 1 LaFortune also appeals the order denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6999 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that could not be directly excluded under sub. (6)(b).” The court determined that the main purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89658 - 2012-11-26
that could not be directly excluded under sub. (6)(b).” The court determined that the main purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89658 - 2012-11-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County: MARSHALL B. MURRAY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 DONALD, P.J.1 I.B. (hereinafter “Ivy”)2 appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=664730 - 2023-06-06
County: MARSHALL B. MURRAY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 DONALD, P.J.1 I.B. (hereinafter “Ivy”)2 appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=664730 - 2023-06-06
State v. Michael H.
with the child. (b) In this subsection, “substantial parental relationship” means the acceptance and exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2348 - 2005-03-31
with the child. (b) In this subsection, “substantial parental relationship” means the acceptance and exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2348 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, it concluded that Heffner was a fiduciary under WIS. STAT. § 112.01(1)(b), and that there were no facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251102 - 2019-12-11
, it concluded that Heffner was a fiduciary under WIS. STAT. § 112.01(1)(b), and that there were no facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251102 - 2019-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 973.01(2)(b)3., and there was no maximum term of extended supervision. In August 2002, Carl pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35970 - 2009-03-30
. § 973.01(2)(b)3., and there was no maximum term of extended supervision. In August 2002, Carl pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35970 - 2009-03-30
Frontsheet
] and SCR 20:1.4(b).[3] [Count III] By failing to timely file a response to grievances filed by [C.B
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78004 - 2012-02-09
] and SCR 20:1.4(b).[3] [Count III] By failing to timely file a response to grievances filed by [C.B
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78004 - 2012-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2021CV89 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III SARAH B. HAPPE REVOCABLE TRUST
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865423 - 2024-10-22
. No. 2021CV89 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III SARAH B. HAPPE REVOCABLE TRUST
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865423 - 2024-10-22