Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5751 - 5760 of 50070 for our.
Search results 5751 - 5760 of 50070 for our.
CA Blank Order
was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103691 - 2013-11-04
was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103691 - 2013-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond, and has not filed a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344217 - 2021-03-10
to respond, and has not filed a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344217 - 2021-03-10
[PDF]
City of Eau Claire v. Christopher A. Jerram
. State v Braunsdorf, 98 Wis. 2d 569, 580, 297 N.W.2d 808 (1980). In Braunsdorf, our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20984 - 2017-09-21
. State v Braunsdorf, 98 Wis. 2d 569, 580, 297 N.W.2d 808 (1980). In Braunsdorf, our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20984 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
which relief may be granted. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115308 - 2014-06-19
which relief may be granted. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115308 - 2014-06-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to challenging the validity of Littlejohn’s pleas. Our review of the record— including the plea questionnaire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262710 - 2020-06-02
to challenging the validity of Littlejohn’s pleas. Our review of the record— including the plea questionnaire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262710 - 2020-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court erred in denying the remaining claims in Agnew’s postconviction motion. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757254 - 2024-01-30
court erred in denying the remaining claims in Agnew’s postconviction motion. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757254 - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the records and of counsel’s analysis in the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004236 - 2025-09-03
246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the records and of counsel’s analysis in the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004236 - 2025-09-03
[PDF]
State v. James Zamitalo
the “court's belief.” Based upon our review of the record, the following exchange among Jeffrey Jensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10818 - 2017-09-20
the “court's belief.” Based upon our review of the record, the following exchange among Jeffrey Jensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10818 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the records, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218892 - 2018-09-07
. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the records, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218892 - 2018-09-07
Frank Rzepkowski v. Robert Schuenke
. Our conclusion that the exception applies to situations such as the present is supported by both case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14197 - 2005-03-31
. Our conclusion that the exception applies to situations such as the present is supported by both case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14197 - 2005-03-31