Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5751 - 5760 of 50100 for our.
Search results 5751 - 5760 of 50100 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891839 - 2024-12-19
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891839 - 2024-12-19
[PDF]
State v. Kendrick C. East III
that “we’re willing to waive the intrastate detainer if we can receive our 90-day speedy trial request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6365 - 2017-09-19
that “we’re willing to waive the intrastate detainer if we can receive our 90-day speedy trial request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6365 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the records, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218892 - 2018-09-07
. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the records, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218892 - 2018-09-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-NM 2 of her right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253356 - 2020-02-04
-NM 2 of her right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253356 - 2020-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arguable merit. See State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=826061 - 2024-07-17
arguable merit. See State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=826061 - 2024-07-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103691 - 2017-09-21
was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103691 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, our review of the plea colloquy confirmed that Wright’s guilty pleas were properly entered. Had our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97871 - 2013-06-11
, our review of the plea colloquy confirmed that Wright’s guilty pleas were properly entered. Had our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97871 - 2013-06-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
contact with the child. Based upon our review Nos. 2022AP410 2022AP1271 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694679 - 2023-08-30
contact with the child. Based upon our review Nos. 2022AP410 2022AP1271 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694679 - 2023-08-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights form and plea hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279090 - 2020-08-18
. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights form and plea hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279090 - 2020-08-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and response and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234568 - 2019-02-13
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and response and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234568 - 2019-02-13