Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57511 - 57520 of 82617 for judgment for m s.
Search results 57511 - 57520 of 82617 for judgment for m s.
[PDF]
State v. David J.M.
of the circuit court for Walworth County: MICHAEL S. GIBBS, Judge. Affirmed. SNYDER, P.J. David J.M
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13881 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Walworth County: MICHAEL S. GIBBS, Judge. Affirmed. SNYDER, P.J. David J.M
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13881 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Wood County Dept. of Social Services v. Mabel R.
. NO. 2005AP851 IN THE INTEREST OF TRACEY S. R., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18: WOOD COUNTY DEPARTMENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19427 - 2017-09-21
. NO. 2005AP851 IN THE INTEREST OF TRACEY S. R., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18: WOOD COUNTY DEPARTMENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19427 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shawn H.
s. 938.538 or the adult intensive sanctions program under s. 301.048. (d) The desirability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12717 - 2017-09-21
s. 938.538 or the adult intensive sanctions program under s. 301.048. (d) The desirability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12717 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of [Aranzamendi] in the interview room and was entitled to comment on his conclusions regarding [Aranzamendi]’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57484 - 2014-09-15
of [Aranzamendi] in the interview room and was entitled to comment on his conclusions regarding [Aranzamendi]’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57484 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, is sufficient to revoke [Adams’s] supervised release…. I find that the [S]tate has proven by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722015 - 2023-10-31
, is sufficient to revoke [Adams’s] supervised release…. I find that the [S]tate has proven by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722015 - 2023-10-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the statute to the contrary. ¶7 “[S]tatutory interpretation ‘begins with the language of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363708 - 2021-05-06
of the statute to the contrary. ¶7 “[S]tatutory interpretation ‘begins with the language of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363708 - 2021-05-06
State v. Stacey R.W.
as specified in s. 48.243 and shall be informed that a request for a jury trial or for a substitution of judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3132 - 2005-03-31
as specified in s. 48.243 and shall be informed that a request for a jury trial or for a substitution of judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3132 - 2005-03-31
State v. David P. Gascoigne
County: MICHAEL S. FISHER, Judge. Affirmed. SNYDER, P.J. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13684 - 2005-03-31
County: MICHAEL S. FISHER, Judge. Affirmed. SNYDER, P.J. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13684 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dorian H.
the case in juvenile court. The record before the court details Dorian H.'s gang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9277 - 2005-03-31
the case in juvenile court. The record before the court details Dorian H.'s gang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9277 - 2005-03-31
John Doe v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee
lawsuits filed in Milwaukee County Circuit Court against the Archdiocese. Doe 1, Doe 2, and Doe 3’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26312 - 2006-08-28
lawsuits filed in Milwaukee County Circuit Court against the Archdiocese. Doe 1, Doe 2, and Doe 3’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26312 - 2006-08-28