Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57531 - 57540 of 68257 for law.
Search results 57531 - 57540 of 68257 for law.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
questions of law and fact. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 698 (1984). We will not set aside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192264 - 2017-09-21
questions of law and fact. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 698 (1984). We will not set aside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192264 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
standing is a question of law. See State v. Eskridge, 2002 WI App 158, ¶9, 256 Wis. 2d 314, 647 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546054 - 2022-07-26
standing is a question of law. See State v. Eskridge, 2002 WI App 158, ¶9, 256 Wis. 2d 314, 647 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546054 - 2022-07-26
Adrian Laurich v. Jon Litscher
a claim for relief. These are all questions of law, which we review de novo. When deciding whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5676 - 2005-03-31
a claim for relief. These are all questions of law, which we review de novo. When deciding whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5676 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
properly applied the law to the facts is a question of law we review independently. Id. I. Number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87972 - 2014-09-15
properly applied the law to the facts is a question of law we review independently. Id. I. Number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87972 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jannice C. Petry
constitutions is a question of law that this court decides without deference to the trial court. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3234 - 2017-09-19
constitutions is a question of law that this court decides without deference to the trial court. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3234 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and application of a statute to an undisputed set of facts are questions of law that we review independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156464 - 2017-09-21
and application of a statute to an undisputed set of facts are questions of law that we review independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156464 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Walters
to understand the law the trial court applied when it made the statements upon which Walters relies to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14727 - 2017-09-21
to understand the law the trial court applied when it made the statements upon which Walters relies to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14727 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 151
agreed with Stoeckl’s argument, stating that “there is no case law to indicate that the continuum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28931 - 2014-09-15
agreed with Stoeckl’s argument, stating that “there is no case law to indicate that the continuum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28931 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony is necessary in a given situation presents a question of law subject to de novo review. Grace v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98443 - 2013-06-24
testimony is necessary in a given situation presents a question of law subject to de novo review. Grace v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98443 - 2013-06-24
COURT OF APPEALS
requires resentencing: Under established law, a “new factor” may justify a circuit court’s exercise of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122805 - 2014-09-29
requires resentencing: Under established law, a “new factor” may justify a circuit court’s exercise of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122805 - 2014-09-29