Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57531 - 57540 of 63559 for records.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way to a rational and legally sound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28299 - 2007-03-05

WI App 42 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1345-CR Complete Title...
] The parties have not informed us of, and the record does not indicate, the length of the term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109611 - 2014-04-29

[PDF] NOTICE
an award. The record does show that the Meises filed an appeal with the Grant County Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30501 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The record indicates that the stop occurred at 2:11 a.m. on the on-ramp from Highway 33 to Interstate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78531 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
not be difficult to remove mineral rights owned by others; the record is silent on this matter. Brandt evidently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28120 - 2007-02-12

COURT OF APPEALS
-14, 311 N.W.2d 600 (1981) (facts not included in the record before the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48903 - 2010-04-12

[PDF] 97-10 Amendment of SCR 70.36(5); SCR Chapter 75-Appointment, Performance Evaluation, Continuing Education, Discipline & Decisions of Circuit Court Commissioners. See 97-10A Order issued 12/2/98.
and the Wisconsin Records Management Committee and additional matters brought to its attention. IT IS ORDERED
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. James Peterson
fails to show any evidence in the record from which it might be inferred that Jessyca’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13437 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶8 Sheffield insists “[t]he record does not support the claim that endorsement no. 5 was emailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193613 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
a telephone conference under s. 807.13 on the record and only for so long as is necessary, taking into account
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34851 - 2008-12-11