Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57551 - 57560 of 83988 for simple case search.
Search results 57551 - 57560 of 83988 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
checklist, and we do not hold that a circuit court must examine each factor on the record in every case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34837 - 2008-12-08
checklist, and we do not hold that a circuit court must examine each factor on the record in every case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34837 - 2008-12-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2019-20).1 We further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501423 - 2022-03-31
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2019-20).1 We further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501423 - 2022-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response. Kluck has not responded. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001752 - 2025-08-28
to file a response. Kluck has not responded. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001752 - 2025-08-28
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531748 - 2022-06-08
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531748 - 2022-06-08
Durand Cooperatives v. Dennis Emmert
. The case was heard in small claims court, and the court held for Durand. Specifically, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12417 - 2005-03-31
. The case was heard in small claims court, and the court held for Durand. Specifically, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12417 - 2005-03-31
Luetzow Industries v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
Industries. In a previous judgment in this case, the trial court reversed the Commission's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8431 - 2005-03-31
Industries. In a previous judgment in this case, the trial court reversed the Commission's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8431 - 2005-03-31
Rule Order
concluded that even if the amendment at issue is consistent with controlling case law, the language
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84593 - 2012-07-04
concluded that even if the amendment at issue is consistent with controlling case law, the language
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84593 - 2012-07-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Rennhack did not respond. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027898 - 2025-10-28
a response. Rennhack did not respond. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027898 - 2025-10-28
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817500 - 2024-06-20
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817500 - 2024-06-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and that any sentences in this case should be consecutive to the sentence imposed after revocation of Hicks’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1103183 - 2026-04-14
and that any sentences in this case should be consecutive to the sentence imposed after revocation of Hicks’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1103183 - 2026-04-14