Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 69967 for as he.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 69967 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. Steven D. Cathey
the jail sentences because he did not refuse probation, and no probation revocation proceedings took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13754 - 2014-09-15
the jail sentences because he did not refuse probation, and no probation revocation proceedings took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13754 - 2014-09-15
Christopher B. v. Timothy L. Schoeneck
The underlying facts are essentially undisputed. Schoeneck testified that after he graduated from a Lutheran
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15148 - 2005-03-31
The underlying facts are essentially undisputed. Schoeneck testified that after he graduated from a Lutheran
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15148 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mahlick D. Ellington
motion for postconviction relief. 1 He contends that: (1) the trial court erred in instructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20039 - 2017-09-21
motion for postconviction relief. 1 He contends that: (1) the trial court erred in instructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20039 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The charges against Schoch arose from allegations that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050940 - 2025-12-16
of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The charges against Schoch arose from allegations that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050940 - 2025-12-16
State v. Steven D. Cathey
that the trial court erred in imposing the jail sentences because he did not refuse probation, and no probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13754 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred in imposing the jail sentences because he did not refuse probation, and no probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13754 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven D. Cathey
that the trial court erred in imposing the jail sentences because he did not refuse probation, and no probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13755 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred in imposing the jail sentences because he did not refuse probation, and no probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13755 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The charges against Schoch arose from allegations that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050940 - 2025-12-16
of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The charges against Schoch arose from allegations that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050940 - 2025-12-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with blankets. The next morning he sent their children off to school and went to work. Upon returning home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226342 - 2018-11-07
with blankets. The next morning he sent their children off to school and went to work. Upon returning home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226342 - 2018-11-07
State v. Daniel C. Tuescher
a police officer, but that conviction was vacated and he was later convicted of and sentenced for first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14459 - 2005-03-31
a police officer, but that conviction was vacated and he was later convicted of and sentenced for first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14459 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Christopher B. v. Timothy L. Schoeneck
undisputed. Schoeneck testified that after he graduated from a Lutheran seminary in 1988, he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15148 - 2017-09-21
undisputed. Schoeneck testified that after he graduated from a Lutheran seminary in 1988, he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15148 - 2017-09-21