Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 69368 for as he.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 69368 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. Ronan T. Heaney
that the arresting officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. He argues that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6167 - 2017-09-19
that the arresting officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. He argues that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6167 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
officer, Corey Colburn, tried to contact Long in his apartment, but he did not respond. Colburn had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131902 - 2014-12-22
officer, Corey Colburn, tried to contact Long in his apartment, but he did not respond. Colburn had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131902 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Leonard R. Avery
. No. 2005AP1447 2 based on newly discovered evidence. Avery claims he should be granted a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21746 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2005AP1447 2 based on newly discovered evidence. Avery claims he should be granted a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21746 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for resentencing. He challenges only his sentences. Because we conclude that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123271 - 2017-09-21
for resentencing. He challenges only his sentences. Because we conclude that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123271 - 2017-09-21
State v. Chad E. Lamberies
intoxicated. Lamberies asserts that he did not validly waive his constitutional right to an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20539 - 2005-12-05
intoxicated. Lamberies asserts that he did not validly waive his constitutional right to an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20539 - 2005-12-05
State v. Steven D. Cathey
that the trial court erred in imposing the jail sentences because he did not refuse probation, and no probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13754 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred in imposing the jail sentences because he did not refuse probation, and no probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13754 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven D. Cathey
that the trial court erred in imposing the jail sentences because he did not refuse probation, and no probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13755 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred in imposing the jail sentences because he did not refuse probation, and no probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13755 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel, Attorney Michael Backes, informed the court that he was not prepared to proceed. Backes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73344 - 2011-11-07
counsel, Attorney Michael Backes, informed the court that he was not prepared to proceed. Backes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73344 - 2011-11-07
State v. Lonny Mayer
to a witness in violation of Wis. Stat. §§ 939.30(1), 939.31 and 940.201(2) (2001-02).[1] He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6870 - 2005-03-31
to a witness in violation of Wis. Stat. §§ 939.30(1), 939.31 and 940.201(2) (2001-02).[1] He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6870 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stanley A. Otis
choice at your (continued) No. 99-1978 3 When he asked Otis whether he would submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15800 - 2017-09-21
choice at your (continued) No. 99-1978 3 When he asked Otis whether he would submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15800 - 2017-09-21