Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 69399 for as he.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Backes, informed the court that he was not prepared to proceed. Backes explained that despite having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73344 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
counsel, Attorney Michael Backes, informed the court that he was not prepared to proceed. Backes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73344 - 2011-11-07

COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Keandre Frazier appeals a judgment of conviction. He challenges the denial of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95338 - 2013-04-10

State v. Max W. Ohlmann
of the evidence against him. He argues that the affidavit supporting the warrant contained recklessly made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26366 - 2006-09-05

[PDF] State v. Royce Minnich
and failing to include him in a conference in chambers pertaining to his plea agreement. He further asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13668 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. John C. Johnson
for a second-offense operating while intoxicated. First, he argues that probable cause is required to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2276 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 16, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
of possessing illegal drugs, and one count of possessing an electric weapon. He also appeals an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27161 - 2006-11-15

COURT OF APPEALS
of an intoxicant, third offense, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). He contends the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30342 - 2007-09-19

State v. Stanley A. Otis
to Wisconsin’s Implied Consent law.[2] When he asked Otis whether he would submit to a chemical breath test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15800 - 2005-03-31

State v. Chad E. Lamberies
intoxicated. Lamberies asserts that he did not validly waive his constitutional right to an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20539 - 2008-08-25