Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 25709 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 25709 for bench warrant/1000.
State v. Jon A. York
to suppress because he claims that: (1) the affidavit in support of the search warrant did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5157 - 2005-03-31
to suppress because he claims that: (1) the affidavit in support of the search warrant did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5157 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jon A. York
claims that: (1) the affidavit in support of the search warrant did not establish probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5157 - 2017-09-19
claims that: (1) the affidavit in support of the search warrant did not establish probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5157 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Tomas R. Payano-Roman
the Fourth Amendment. The officers made no attempt to obtain a warrant to search Payano-Roman
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25202 - 2017-09-21
the Fourth Amendment. The officers made no attempt to obtain a warrant to search Payano-Roman
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25202 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tomas R. Payano-Roman
. The officers made no attempt to obtain a warrant to search Payano-Roman. Warrantless searches are per se
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25202 - 2006-05-17
. The officers made no attempt to obtain a warrant to search Payano-Roman. Warrantless searches are per se
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25202 - 2006-05-17
State v. Malcolm M. Mumm
, cannot be analyzed for evidentiary purposes without obtaining a second search warrant. In Thorstad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3415 - 2005-03-31
, cannot be analyzed for evidentiary purposes without obtaining a second search warrant. In Thorstad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3415 - 2005-03-31
State v. Matthew J. Andersen
-and-announce requirement when executing a search warrant at Andersen’s residence. We sustain the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3822 - 2005-03-31
-and-announce requirement when executing a search warrant at Andersen’s residence. We sustain the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3822 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a search warrant prior to searching Fields’s apartment, whether there was sufficient evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470798 - 2022-01-11
a search warrant prior to searching Fields’s apartment, whether there was sufficient evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470798 - 2022-01-11
[PDF]
State v. Malcolm M. Mumm
for evidentiary purposes without obtaining a second search warrant. In Thorstad, citing to Schmerber v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3415 - 2017-09-19
for evidentiary purposes without obtaining a second search warrant. In Thorstad, citing to Schmerber v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3415 - 2017-09-19
State v. John C. Zittlow
occupants’ identifications through dispatch, which informed Wudtke that Price had multiple warrants out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25757 - 2006-07-04
occupants’ identifications through dispatch, which informed Wudtke that Price had multiple warrants out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25757 - 2006-07-04
[PDF]
State v. Matthew J. Andersen
complied with the knock-and-announce requirement when executing a search warrant at Andersen’s residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3822 - 2017-09-20
complied with the knock-and-announce requirement when executing a search warrant at Andersen’s residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3822 - 2017-09-20