Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 24751 for extending.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 24751 for extending.
COURT OF APPEALS
impose and stay a sentence of two years of initial confinement and two years of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60761 - 2011-03-07
impose and stay a sentence of two years of initial confinement and two years of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60761 - 2011-03-07
Rule Order
available online. The rule does not extend to other appellate filings, including appendices, because
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136526 - 2015-03-01
available online. The rule does not extend to other appellate filings, including appendices, because
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136526 - 2015-03-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
extend the deadline for a decision in this case. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.82(2)(a); Rhonda R.D. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612857 - 2023-01-20
extend the deadline for a decision in this case. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.82(2)(a); Rhonda R.D. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612857 - 2023-01-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether there is any basis for a challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138270 - 2017-09-21
of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether there is any basis for a challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138270 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bret J. Chapin
(2) expired and were not specifically extended while this matter was pending in the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19880 - 2005-10-11
(2) expired and were not specifically extended while this matter was pending in the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19880 - 2005-10-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years’ extended supervision. Appellate counsel addressed four issues. The first was whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165874 - 2017-09-21
years’ extended supervision. Appellate counsel addressed four issues. The first was whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165874 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to three years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision on the second count. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113388 - 2014-06-02
to three years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision on the second count. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113388 - 2014-06-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In exchange, the State agreed to recommend five years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204609 - 2017-12-05
. In exchange, the State agreed to recommend five years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204609 - 2017-12-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Blount to a four-year prison sentence, “two in and two on ES [extended supervision].” ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529825 - 2022-06-08
Blount to a four-year prison sentence, “two in and two on ES [extended supervision].” ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529825 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
Waushara County v. Lisa K.
order dated July 19, 1999, which extended for a second time a CHIPS order of August 11, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2331 - 2017-09-19
order dated July 19, 1999, which extended for a second time a CHIPS order of August 11, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2331 - 2017-09-19