Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 49819 for our.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 49819 for our.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facts for our review, which neither party challenges, are as follows. No. 2016AP2265 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196506 - 2017-09-21
facts for our review, which neither party challenges, are as follows. No. 2016AP2265 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196506 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
). Our review of the Record—including the plea questionnaire/waiver of rights form and the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857006 - 2024-10-02
). Our review of the Record—including the plea questionnaire/waiver of rights form and the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857006 - 2024-10-02
State v. Casey J. Schneck
supports our ruling on a further basis. The Hyndman court also said, “A plea of ‘not guilty’ creates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4979 - 2005-03-31
supports our ruling on a further basis. The Hyndman court also said, “A plea of ‘not guilty’ creates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4979 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth L. Moucha
on the applicable law. Id. Moucha claims that the trial court failed to properly apply the law. Our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13322 - 2017-09-21
on the applicable law. Id. Moucha claims that the trial court failed to properly apply the law. Our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13322 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
), there is no reason not to apply it here where the supreme court did not reverse our earlier holding and did not reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31680 - 2008-02-05
), there is no reason not to apply it here where the supreme court did not reverse our earlier holding and did not reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31680 - 2008-02-05
[PDF]
State v. Michael P. Stefko
. Despite these warnings he did not retain an attorney. Our independent review of the record convinces us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10097 - 2017-09-19
. Despite these warnings he did not retain an attorney. Our independent review of the record convinces us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10097 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
a pro se motion for sentence modification, arguing that his bifurcated sentence conflicted with our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99700 - 2013-07-22
a pro se motion for sentence modification, arguing that his bifurcated sentence conflicted with our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99700 - 2013-07-22
State v. Michael W. Lang
for a new trial. ¶4 We will recite the relevant facts during the course of our discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15510 - 2005-03-31
for a new trial. ¶4 We will recite the relevant facts during the course of our discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15510 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
), and WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2011-12). At our request, Attorney Backes also filed a supplemental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94997 - 2014-09-15
), and WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2011-12). At our request, Attorney Backes also filed a supplemental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94997 - 2014-09-15
State v. Rayshun D. Eason
in this case did not reach that “limited threshold.” ¶8 Our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14468 - 2005-03-31
in this case did not reach that “limited threshold.” ¶8 Our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14468 - 2005-03-31