Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 50070 for our.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 50070 for our.
[PDF]
State v. Anthony D. Williams
of the testimony. Thomas v. State, 92 Wis.2d 372, 382, 284 N.W.2d 917, 923 (1979). We will substitute our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10284 - 2017-09-20
of the testimony. Thomas v. State, 92 Wis.2d 372, 382, 284 N.W.2d 917, 923 (1979). We will substitute our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10284 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. James Zamitalo
the “court's belief.” Based upon our review of the record, the following exchange among Jeffrey Jensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10818 - 2017-09-20
the “court's belief.” Based upon our review of the record, the following exchange among Jeffrey Jensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10818 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a response, but she has not responded. Based upon our independent review of the Records and the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990110 - 2025-07-30
a response, but she has not responded. Based upon our independent review of the Records and the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990110 - 2025-07-30
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a response, but she has not responded. Based upon our independent review of the Records and the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990110 - 2025-07-30
a response, but she has not responded. Based upon our independent review of the Records and the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990110 - 2025-07-30
State v. Amy Willoughby
is clear and unambiguous on its face, our inquiry ends, and we must simply apply the statute to the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12407 - 2005-03-31
is clear and unambiguous on its face, our inquiry ends, and we must simply apply the statute to the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12407 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to challenging the validity of Littlejohn’s pleas. Our review of the record— including the plea questionnaire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262710 - 2020-06-02
to challenging the validity of Littlejohn’s pleas. Our review of the record— including the plea questionnaire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262710 - 2020-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
mistrial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214284 - 2018-06-13
mistrial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214284 - 2018-06-13
[PDF]
State v. Marvin D. Doyle
analysis of the issues and raising additional issues. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9464 - 2017-09-19
analysis of the issues and raising additional issues. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9464 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a claim that Beard’s sentence was excessive. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245102 - 2019-08-09
to a claim that Beard’s sentence was excessive. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245102 - 2019-08-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534825 - 2022-06-22
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534825 - 2022-06-22