Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 17244 for probate/1000.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 17244 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
State v. John R. Martin
, and Martin was ordered to serve five years probation for each charge. The periods of probation were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11308 - 2017-09-19
, and Martin was ordered to serve five years probation for each charge. The periods of probation were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11308 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John R. Martin
, and Martin was ordered to serve five years probation for each charge. The periods of probation were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11310 - 2017-09-19
, and Martin was ordered to serve five years probation for each charge. The periods of probation were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11310 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
support in exchange for a recommendation of three years of probation and sixty days in jail. Id., ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95750 - 2014-09-15
support in exchange for a recommendation of three years of probation and sixty days in jail. Id., ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95750 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). 5 We observe that in explaining why probation was not appropriate, the sentencing court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165970 - 2017-09-21
). 5 We observe that in explaining why probation was not appropriate, the sentencing court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165970 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
surcharge. For the third offense, the court ordered two years’ probation with a withheld sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146175 - 2017-09-21
surcharge. For the third offense, the court ordered two years’ probation with a withheld sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146175 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John R. Martin
, and Martin was ordered to serve five years probation for each charge. The periods of probation were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11307 - 2017-09-19
, and Martin was ordered to serve five years probation for each charge. The periods of probation were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11307 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John R. Martin
, and Martin was ordered to serve five years probation for each charge. The periods of probation were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11306 - 2017-09-19
, and Martin was ordered to serve five years probation for each charge. The periods of probation were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11306 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mary Boyer
of the accused, may defer further proceedings and place him or her on probation upon terms and conditions. Upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8718 - 2005-03-31
of the accused, may defer further proceedings and place him or her on probation upon terms and conditions. Upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8718 - 2005-03-31
State v. Todd Jerovetz
position that probation should be granted, the prosecutor detailed statements of co-defendants indicating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5356 - 2005-03-31
position that probation should be granted, the prosecutor detailed statements of co-defendants indicating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5356 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
think when you get out of prison, you should be under … the Probation Department[’s supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52522 - 2010-07-26
think when you get out of prison, you should be under … the Probation Department[’s supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52522 - 2010-07-26