Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 59312 for quit claim deed.

Frontsheet
interpreted a statute that exempted a homestead from claims of creditors if the parcel of land did not exceed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29435 - 2007-06-18

[PDF] WI 73
. In Weisbrod, we interpreted a statute that exempted a homestead from claims of creditors if the parcel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29435 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October
Schulpius’s claim that the delay in finding housing for him violated his constitutional right to due process
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19860 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
. Because the court viewed the claim as alleging ineffective assistance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114827 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
his petition in the wrong forum. Because the court viewed the claim as alleging ineffective
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114827 - 2011-02-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and then forced his hand upward to ‘grab’ her vaginal area, an action that [D.J.] did not claim to have happened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70385 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Terrance L. Edwards
for postconviction relief. Edwards raises six instances of error, which he claims warrant vacating his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21651 - 2017-09-21

State v. Terrance L. Edwards
. Edwards raises six instances of error, which he claims warrant vacating his conviction. Because all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21651 - 2006-03-06

Chris Gentilli v. The Board of Police and Fire Commissioners of the City of Madison
of Gentilli’s constitutional claims and remanded the certiorari proceeding. Id., ¶3. The court reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25062 - 2006-05-08

[PDF] Donald L. Freyberg v. Mavis A. Freyberg
decreasing Mavis A. Freyberg’s maintenance. He claims that the circuit court erroneously No. 04
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7438 - 2017-09-20