Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5761 - 5770 of 6401 for wide.

[PDF] WI App 59
by two- inch pattern; or lines that are at least one-eighth inch wide and spaced no more than two inches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711316 - 2024-01-24

COURT OF APPEALS
“the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Id. at 689. To establish prejudice, Emiliano must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69124 - 2011-08-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
presume that counsel’s performance fell within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024278 - 2025-10-16

COURT OF APPEALS
A trial court has wide discretion in framing a special verdict, Murray v. Holiday Rambler, Inc., 83 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29335 - 2007-06-12

WI App 112 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1750 Complete Title o...
standard of review is well established: A trial court has wide discretion as to the instructions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123530 - 2014-11-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel that are ‘outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.’” State v. Arredondo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033466 - 2025-12-17

[PDF] State v. William A. Silva
“outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5320 - 2017-09-19

Robert Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc.
court has wide discretion in framing special verdict questions, provided the verdict adequately covers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25578 - 2006-06-27

[PDF] WI APP 112
has wide discretion as to the instructions it will give to a jury in any particular case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123530 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Adrian Lomax v. Patrick Fiedler
," decisions of prison administrators are entitled to "wide-ranging deference." Jones v. North Carolina
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9551 - 2017-09-19