Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57691 - 57700 of 98660 for court records search online.
Search results 57691 - 57700 of 98660 for court records search online.
State v. Richard J. Common
by counsel. Based on the record, this court concludes that Common knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2113 - 2005-03-31
by counsel. Based on the record, this court concludes that Common knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard J. Common
court may not find, based on the record, that there was a valid waiver of counsel.” Id. ¶6 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2113 - 2017-09-19
court may not find, based on the record, that there was a valid waiver of counsel.” Id. ¶6 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2113 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 1, 2007 David R. Schanker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28818 - 2014-09-15
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 1, 2007 David R. Schanker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28818 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Yathzee D. Inman
County of a child age 14. The record in the trial court contains no indication that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10404 - 2017-09-20
County of a child age 14. The record in the trial court contains no indication that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10404 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. There is nothing in the record to support an argument that the court’s findings were clearly erroneous
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878677 - 2024-11-20
. There is nothing in the record to support an argument that the court’s findings were clearly erroneous
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878677 - 2024-11-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. There is nothing in the record to support an argument that the court’s findings were clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878677 - 2024-11-20
. There is nothing in the record to support an argument that the court’s findings were clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878677 - 2024-11-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pronouncement is ambiguous, this Court reviews the full record to determine the sentencing court’s intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980009 - 2025-07-09
pronouncement is ambiguous, this Court reviews the full record to determine the sentencing court’s intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980009 - 2025-07-09
[PDF]
State v. Mario M. Martinez
the trial court had fully analyzed the restitution amounts. Indeed, the record reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2751 - 2017-09-19
the trial court had fully analyzed the restitution amounts. Indeed, the record reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2751 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mario M. Martinez
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 7, 2001 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2751 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 7, 2001 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2751 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28072 - 2007-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28072 - 2007-02-12