Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5771 - 5780 of 29996 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] Lisa Aumann v. Patricia Anderson
, the existence of a contract becomes a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. at 172-73. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7461 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
of the officer’s actions is de novo. See Johnson, 299 Wis. 2d 675, ¶13. ¶6 The officers reasonably searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36191 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Sunburst IV Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
the circuit court has authority to make a de novo determination regarding costs when reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5664 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Cara M. Wehrenberg v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
. WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). We review the circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3832 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Anthony J. Kaufmann v. Jason Baumann
such claims de novo. See First Nat’l Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11798 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. State v. Lesik, 2010 WI App 12, ¶6, 322 Wis. 2d 753, 780 N.W.2d 210 (Ct. App. 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70076 - 2011-08-23

COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72525 - 2011-10-19

COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶14. ¶6 This court resolved Ellis’s appeal from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36480 - 2010-03-31

State v. David Scott Mathis
to proceed is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Bollig, 222 Wis. 2d 558, 563, 587 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3074 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael L. Sellers
to join separate crimes is a question of law reviewed de novo. See State v. Hoffman, 106 Wis.2d 185, 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9319 - 2005-03-31