Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5771 - 5780 of 29368 for er.

State v. Patricia E. K.
motions in each case. Patricia contends that the court erred when it denied her motion for an adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20695 - 2005-12-19

[PDF] NOTICE
, make any argument in her brief to explain how the circuit court erred by obligating her to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50738 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jean Hobbs v. Milwaukee School of Engineering
the trial court erred in determining that the defect that caused the mirror to fall and cause injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6779 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was not supported by probable cause and that the circuit court therefore erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533445 - 2022-06-16

COURT OF APPEALS
erred by denying Lee’s motions challenging the sufficiency of the evidence at trial; and (4) the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147252 - 2015-08-26

State v. Eduardo D. Handal
argues that the circuit court erred when it found that Dumke provided effective representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2763 - 2005-03-31

Jean Hobbs v. Milwaukee School of Engineering
. Stat. § 101.11 (2001-02).[1] Hobbs claims the trial court erred in determining that the defect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6779 - 2005-03-31

State v. Stance Williamson, Jr.
of the circumstances to establish probable cause; and (2) whether the trial court erred in admitting hearsay evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10325 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jamal Purifoy
erred in denying his motion to withdraw his plea because: (1) it failed to ascertain an adequate factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9077 - 2005-03-31

Michael Davis v. Gary McCaughtry
that the trial court erred because he is entitled to a trial on his claim that Neuenschwander was negligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13263 - 2005-03-31