Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57701 - 57710 of 68143 for law.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
properly applied the law to the facts is a question of law we review independently. Id. I. Number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87972 - 2014-09-15

State of Wisconsin, v. Wandell Lee
"upon such terms as may be agreed upon by the parties or fixed by the court."[6] Federal case law has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16877 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Martin B., Sr.
of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel rest on an unsettled area of the law, the threshold task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8787 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the testator’s “general condition continued—not as a matter of law but as a matter of fact––at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220560 - 2018-10-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
questions of law and fact. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 698 (1984). We will not set aside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149536 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Dennis R. Thiel
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 980.07 is discretionary. Both issues involve questions of constitutional law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2156 - 2017-09-19

Robert A. Smith v. Janet H. Sahagian
court’s decision if the court “examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15587 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
question of law and fact. No. 2020AP819-CR 8 See State v. Martwick, 2000 WI 5, ¶16, 231 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346168 - 2021-05-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, that the officers’ concerns for their safety were objectively reasonable and the search was lawful. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66702 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Gregory N. Olson
. These issues involve the interpretation of a statute, which is a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13544 - 2017-09-21