Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57721 - 57730 of 61722 for judgment.
Search results 57721 - 57730 of 61722 for judgment.
COURT OF APPEALS
, or unreasonable and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment, and (4) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30885 - 2007-11-14
, or unreasonable and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment, and (4) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30885 - 2007-11-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
exercising reasonable professional judgment, see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39849 - 2014-09-15
exercising reasonable professional judgment, see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39849 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the judgment is summarily affirmed pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199212 - 2017-10-31
that the judgment is summarily affirmed pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199212 - 2017-10-31
State v. Pamela P.
terminating Pamela P.’s parental rights to Princess as a “judgment.” It is an order and was correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6767 - 2005-03-31
terminating Pamela P.’s parental rights to Princess as a “judgment.” It is an order and was correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6767 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
); § 974.06(7) (stating that appeals from adverse orders under the statute are taken as from a final judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90409 - 2012-12-10
); § 974.06(7) (stating that appeals from adverse orders under the statute are taken as from a final judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90409 - 2012-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not establish bias “unless they display deep-seated favoritism or antagonism that would make fair judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1109112 - 2026-04-28
not establish bias “unless they display deep-seated favoritism or antagonism that would make fair judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1109112 - 2026-04-28
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
before. We affirmed his judgment and postconviction order in his direct appeal, see State v. Wolfe
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1097254 - 2026-04-01
before. We affirmed his judgment and postconviction order in his direct appeal, see State v. Wolfe
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1097254 - 2026-04-01
[PDF]
State v. Monte L. Jackson
the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, an appellate court may not substitute its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13187 - 2017-09-21
the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, an appellate court may not substitute its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13187 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the judgment and order are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=424921 - 2021-09-14
that the judgment and order are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=424921 - 2021-09-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and affirmed Adams’s judgment. State v. Adams, No. 2017AP209-CRNM, unpublished op. and order (WI App Nov. 22
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1110257 - 2026-04-29
and affirmed Adams’s judgment. State v. Adams, No. 2017AP209-CRNM, unpublished op. and order (WI App Nov. 22
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1110257 - 2026-04-29