Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57731 - 57740 of 83330 for simple case search.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
privilege, there was no crime. Thus, this case implicates two sets of statutes: WISCONSIN STAT. § 939.05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149159 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Bales and Kim Hopp (a County social worker involved in T.M.S.’s case) testified. ¶3 Dr. Bales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607616 - 2023-01-11

[PDF] Bettendorf Transfer, Inc. v. Madison Freight Systems, Inc.
this is likely the case, the court’s second rationale is more persuasive. The fee provision gives the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5907 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was appointed counsel, the case was resolved by plea agreement. Tims agreed to plead no contest to two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=978749 - 2025-07-03

[PDF] CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738916 - 2023-12-12

[PDF] State v. Cori E. Jeffers
in that case dismissed the charges on the ground that, although the officers had probable cause to arrest him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12182 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Todd Fugate
in the charging of the case; (2) his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance; (3) he should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5965 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] George T. Markos, Jr. v. William R. Schaller
2003 WI App 174 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-1824
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5451 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
person being charged? Who says so?” Id. (citation omitted). The complaint issued in this case meets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49227 - 2010-04-21

[PDF] John D. Riley v. Ford Motor Company
2001 WI App 234 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-2977
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3222 - 2017-09-19