Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57771 - 57780 of 63529 for records.
Search results 57771 - 57780 of 63529 for records.
Gerald O. v. Cindy R.
. Further, the record reflects that Gerald made his child support payments from June 1995 up to the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10626 - 2005-03-31
. Further, the record reflects that Gerald made his child support payments from June 1995 up to the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10626 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the investigation until he administered the PBT. The record indicates that Pierson was not handcuffed, frisked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34361 - 2008-10-21
in the investigation until he administered the PBT. The record indicates that Pierson was not handcuffed, frisked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34361 - 2008-10-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and without any basis in law.” The record supports the court’s description of the motions. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121637 - 2014-09-16
and without any basis in law.” The record supports the court’s description of the motions. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121637 - 2014-09-16
City of Superior v. Hunter Hill
] The record does not reflect why the Hills were refused entry or why the altercation developed. [3] All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5185 - 2005-03-31
] The record does not reflect why the Hills were refused entry or why the altercation developed. [3] All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5185 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record, the no-merit report, and Foster’s response, we directed counsel to file a supplemental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102706 - 2013-10-02
reviewing the record, the no-merit report, and Foster’s response, we directed counsel to file a supplemental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102706 - 2013-10-02
Frontsheet
in contempt for failing to appear for trial. The trial court stated on the record that there had been prior
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77947 - 2012-02-08
in contempt for failing to appear for trial. The trial court stated on the record that there had been prior
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77947 - 2012-02-08
N.E.M. v. Eugene Strigel
] The judgment contained in the record states that the Strigels' liability was limited to $3,500, but a copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8782 - 2005-03-31
] The judgment contained in the record states that the Strigels' liability was limited to $3,500, but a copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8782 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not assault her. The second piece is a transcript of a “recorded phone conversation” from 2003 that Burns had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66208 - 2011-06-20
not assault her. The second piece is a transcript of a “recorded phone conversation” from 2003 that Burns had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66208 - 2011-06-20
State v. Sylvester Neasman
in the first appeal. There we concluded that the record did not support a meritorious claim that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4324 - 2005-03-31
in the first appeal. There we concluded that the record did not support a meritorious claim that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4324 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert P. Behm
assessment. Further, the trial court stayed the sentence pending this appeal. [2] The record suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13697 - 2009-07-13
assessment. Further, the trial court stayed the sentence pending this appeal. [2] The record suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13697 - 2009-07-13