Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5781 - 5790 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5781 - 5790 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. State v. Perez, 2001 WI 79, ¶12, 244 Wis. 2d 582, 628 N.W.2d 820. In State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304809 - 2020-11-18
of law we review de novo. State v. Perez, 2001 WI 79, ¶12, 244 Wis. 2d 582, 628 N.W.2d 820. In State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304809 - 2020-11-18
[PDF]
Rhonda Neff v. James Pierzina
they are clearly erroneous, but will review de novo whether those findings fulfill a legal standard of prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15421 - 2017-09-21
they are clearly erroneous, but will review de novo whether those findings fulfill a legal standard of prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15421 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dover Lake View Estates LLC v. Town of Dover
the final plat is a question of law which we review de novo. See Pederson v. Town Board, 191 Wis.2d 663
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10234 - 2017-09-20
the final plat is a question of law which we review de novo. See Pederson v. Town Board, 191 Wis.2d 663
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10234 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the experts’ testimony was for the circuit court as the finder of fact. Cf. Riehl v. De Quaine, 24 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132544 - 2017-09-21
the experts’ testimony was for the circuit court as the finder of fact. Cf. Riehl v. De Quaine, 24 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132544 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Arcadia Financial, Ltd. v. Susannah Q. Carey
here. Our review is, therefore, de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364–365, 560
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2102 - 2017-09-19
here. Our review is, therefore, de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364–365, 560
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2102 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Kossow
which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d 642, 648, 416 N.W.2d 60 (1987). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4403 - 2017-09-19
which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d 642, 648, 416 N.W.2d 60 (1987). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4403 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
a particular set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6415 - 2017-09-19
a particular set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6415 - 2017-09-19
Sunburst IV Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
on costs. Under Wis. Stat. § 227.485(6) (2001-02),[1] the circuit court has authority to make a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5664 - 2005-03-31
on costs. Under Wis. Stat. § 227.485(6) (2001-02),[1] the circuit court has authority to make a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5664 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. § 802.08(2). “We review a circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564341 - 2022-09-13
. STAT. § 802.08(2). “We review a circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564341 - 2022-09-13
Wayne J. Houpt v. Roger C. Chase
grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. M & I First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5009 - 2005-03-31
grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. M & I First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5009 - 2005-03-31