Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5781 - 5790 of 24459 for extending.
Search results 5781 - 5790 of 24459 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, dismiss these appeals without prejudice, and extend the time for Rodgers to file a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
, dismiss these appeals without prejudice, and extend the time for Rodgers to file a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Howard
of initial confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision. The court accepted Howard’s pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6247 - 2017-09-19
of initial confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision. The court accepted Howard’s pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6247 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
, 2005 WI App 71, ¶27, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d 574, extends Escalona’s procedural bar to a no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26787 - 2006-10-16
, 2005 WI App 71, ¶27, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d 574, extends Escalona’s procedural bar to a no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26787 - 2006-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to fifteen years of initial confinement plus eight years of extended supervision. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823214 - 2024-07-09
to fifteen years of initial confinement plus eight years of extended supervision. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823214 - 2024-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The court then sentenced Guthrie-Bey to five years of initial confinement and four years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133789 - 2017-09-21
. The court then sentenced Guthrie-Bey to five years of initial confinement and four years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133789 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
confinement and four years’ extended supervision out of a maximum possible twelve years and six months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60274 - 2014-09-15
confinement and four years’ extended supervision out of a maximum possible twelve years and six months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60274 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of nine years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision for recklessly endangering
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=941051 - 2025-04-16
of nine years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision for recklessly endangering
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=941051 - 2025-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
two years of initial confinement, followed by the maximum period of extended supervision. The letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79523 - 2012-03-14
two years of initial confinement, followed by the maximum period of extended supervision. The letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79523 - 2012-03-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
years’ extended supervision. He was released to supervision in May 2008, then revoked in April 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68388 - 2014-09-15
years’ extended supervision. He was released to supervision in May 2008, then revoked in April 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68388 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
five years’ initial confinement followed by five years’ extended supervision, without eligibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866065 - 2024-10-22
five years’ initial confinement followed by five years’ extended supervision, without eligibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866065 - 2024-10-22