Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5791 - 5800 of 83284 for case search.

COURT OF APPEALS
computer during a search of his home. We affirm. ¶2 The facts are undisputed. Police Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34588 - 2008-11-12

[PDF] NOTICE
-CR 2 denying his motion to suppress evidence that resulted from a protective search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33426 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
a protective search for weapons. We agree with Mellum that, under State v. Mohr, 2000 WI App 111, 235 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33426 - 2008-07-16

Circuit court eFiling - eFiling a new judgment or lien case – Wisconsin Court System eFile Support
Circuit court eFiling eFiling a new case Circuit court eFiling - eFiling a new judgment or lien case
/hc/en-us/articles/360056760352-Circuit-court-eFiling-eFiling-a-new-judgment-or-lien-case

Circuit court eFiling - eFiling a new non-earnings garnishment case – Wisconsin Court System eFile
Circuit court eFiling eFiling a new case Circuit court eFiling - eFiling a new non-earnings garnishment
/hc/en-us/articles/360056765512-Circuit-court-eFiling-eFiling-a-new-non-earnings-garnishment-case

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/news/archives/archive.jsp?year=2015

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Officers sought to search the apartment Watt shared with his girlfriend, Danella Thurman. In a phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048544 - 2025-12-10

[PDF] WI 59
2021 WI 59 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP1983-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377956 - 2021-06-17

Ronald A. Keith, Sr. v. State
and subjected him to strip searches, random urinalysis, random room searches, and other acts of control beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2245 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
tree and his consent to search was invalid. We reject Perez’s arguments and affirm. Background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28508 - 2014-09-15