Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5791 - 5800 of 72673 for termination of parental rights.
Search results 5791 - 5800 of 72673 for termination of parental rights.
Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2005
5 0 4 17 Leaves to Appeal 50 58 45 53 206 Granted 8 7 4 4 23 Matter of Right 558 533 431 531 2053
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25252 - 2006-05-18
5 0 4 17 Leaves to Appeal 50 58 45 53 206 Granted 8 7 4 4 23 Matter of Right 558 533 431 531 2053
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25252 - 2006-05-18
Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2002
44 Matter of Right 600 598 471 641 2310 Submission 387 371 291 418 1467 Civil 197 226 208 270
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31 - 2005-03-31
44 Matter of Right 600 598 471 641 2310 Submission 387 371 291 418 1467 Civil 197 226 208 270
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31 - 2005-03-31
Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2004
3 1 6 11 Leaves to Appeal 46 50 73 64 233 Granted 10 5 13 18 46 Matter of Right 655 496 471 573
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29 - 2005-03-31
3 1 6 11 Leaves to Appeal 46 50 73 64 233 Granted 10 5 13 18 46 Matter of Right 655 496 471 573
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to pay rent and prohibited Marant from terminating Baez’s tenancy or holding her liable for breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45092 - 2009-12-28
to pay rent and prohibited Marant from terminating Baez’s tenancy or holding her liable for breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45092 - 2009-12-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to her right eye and upper lip, lacerations on her face and head, and was unable to put much weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616446 - 2023-01-31
to her right eye and upper lip, lacerations on her face and head, and was unable to put much weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616446 - 2023-01-31
State v. James C. Sarlund
) he was denied the right to testify in his defense when the trial court prohibited him from explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9191 - 2005-03-31
) he was denied the right to testify in his defense when the trial court prohibited him from explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9191 - 2005-03-31
State v. James C. Sarlund
) he was denied the right to testify in his defense when the trial court prohibited him from explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9190 - 2005-03-31
) he was denied the right to testify in his defense when the trial court prohibited him from explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9190 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James C. Sarlund
was insufficient to convict him of violating the injunction; (2) he was denied the right to testify in his defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9192 - 2017-09-19
was insufficient to convict him of violating the injunction; (2) he was denied the right to testify in his defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9192 - 2017-09-19
State v. James C. Sarlund
) he was denied the right to testify in his defense when the trial court prohibited him from explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9192 - 2005-03-31
) he was denied the right to testify in his defense when the trial court prohibited him from explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9192 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James C. Sarlund
was insufficient to convict him of violating the injunction; (2) he was denied the right to testify in his defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9191 - 2017-09-19
was insufficient to convict him of violating the injunction; (2) he was denied the right to testify in his defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9191 - 2017-09-19