Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57931 - 57940 of 74898 for public records.

COURT OF APPEALS
such that an adequate record existed for review. See Quelle, 198 Wis. 2d 269 at 275. Paulick urges us to exercise our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34029 - 2008-09-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
§ 704.27). Further, the record does not support the court’s reconsideration determination that Hanson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108174 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] John P. Zakowski for the State Department of Workforce Development ex rel Wayne M. Vanden v.
reviewing the record, we conclude the finding is not clearly erroneous. See WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2).2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7284 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of today’s hearing. I would further note for the record that the family clerk from the Clerk of Court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1104273 - 2026-04-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Harrell to pay $7,256.40 in restitution. The record contains both a 2010 amended judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528292 - 2022-06-03

County of Adams v. Daniel M. Ciesla
a directed verdict] unless the record reveals that the circuit court was “clearly wrong.” Weiss v. United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15461 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
will uphold the trial court’s decision if the record contains facts which would support its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76543 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
The only record citation Portmann provides with respect to this argument is to a transcript of a January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145111 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
is conclusory; or (3) if the record conclusively demonstrates that the moving party is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31408 - 2014-09-15

Kohler Company v. Sogen International Fund, Inc.
records identified CEDE & Company, the Petries’ nominee, as the recordholder of the Petries’ share
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15865 - 2005-03-31