Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 581 - 590 of 29821 for des.

[PDF] River Bank of De Soto v. Raymond Fisher
River Bank of De Soto f/k/a De Soto State Bank, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Raymond Fisher
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16980 - 2017-09-21

State v. John E. Kehler
to de novo review. Id. Although we use a de novo standard of review on appeal for determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10592 - 2005-03-31

State of Wisconsin-Department of Corrections v. David H. Schwarz
interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo, and as such, we are not bound by an agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6714 - 2005-03-31

American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company v. Ann Hernandez
is subject to de novo review. Hernandez argues that we should afford, at a minimum, due deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4055 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Town of Burke v. City of Madison
interpretation which we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14011 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. John E. Kehler
to de novo review. Id. Although we use a de novo standard of review on appeal for determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10592 - 2017-09-20

Town of Burke v. City of Madison
de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14011 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State of Wisconsin-Department of Corrections v. David H. Schwarz
). ¶6 “Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo, and as such, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6714 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of discretion, but should instead review the matter de novo. ¶9 We could explain why the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122956 - 2014-10-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
provided by [North’s counsel] would be $820. North sought de novo review of the family court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170612 - 2017-09-21