Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 581 - 590 of 9296 for jurors.
Search results 581 - 590 of 9296 for jurors.
State v. Charles E. Jackson
to strike the only African-American juror; and (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6900 - 2005-03-31
to strike the only African-American juror; and (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6900 - 2005-03-31
Rock County v. Virgil D.
for the credibility of County witnesses, and (c) suggested jurors would be responsible for any harm Virgil might cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21208 - 2006-02-01
for the credibility of County witnesses, and (c) suggested jurors would be responsible for any harm Virgil might cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21208 - 2006-02-01
[PDF]
Rock County v. Virgil D.
commitment, (b) vouched for the credibility of County witnesses, and (c) suggested jurors would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21208 - 2017-09-21
commitment, (b) vouched for the credibility of County witnesses, and (c) suggested jurors would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21208 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bobby D. Arthur
issues one and two, requiring a new trial; (4) an alternate juror’s impropriety in bringing a City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5284 - 2017-09-19
issues one and two, requiring a new trial; (4) an alternate juror’s impropriety in bringing a City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5284 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bobby D. Arthur
one and two, requiring a new trial; (4) an alternate juror’s impropriety in bringing a City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5284 - 2005-03-31
one and two, requiring a new trial; (4) an alternate juror’s impropriety in bringing a City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5284 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
request to voir dire several “sleeping” jurors; (2) violated Muniz-Munoz’s confrontation rights when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162275 - 2017-09-21
request to voir dire several “sleeping” jurors; (2) violated Muniz-Munoz’s confrontation rights when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162275 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
assault A.R.B. ¶6 During deliberations, the jurors submitted a question to the trial court asking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89570 - 2012-11-26
assault A.R.B. ¶6 During deliberations, the jurors submitted a question to the trial court asking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89570 - 2012-11-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the jurors submitted a question to the trial court asking whether they must agree on the “place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89570 - 2014-09-15
, the jurors submitted a question to the trial court asking whether they must agree on the “place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89570 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
on cross-examination. ¶11 During jury selection, defense counsel asked whether any prospective juror
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263253 - 2020-07-20
on cross-examination. ¶11 During jury selection, defense counsel asked whether any prospective juror
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263253 - 2020-07-20
Wisconsin Court System - What's happening in court?
Who are the people in court? Jurors Other times, a group of people decides who wins the argument
/courts/resources/kid/activitybook/court3juror.htm - 2026-03-10
Who are the people in court? Jurors Other times, a group of people decides who wins the argument
/courts/resources/kid/activitybook/court3juror.htm - 2026-03-10