Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 581 - 590 of 58312 for speedy trial.
Search results 581 - 590 of 58312 for speedy trial.
State v. Jeffrey Townsend
of the charges. Accordingly, he contends that the notice provisions of the IAD, and therefore the “speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6169 - 2005-03-31
of the charges. Accordingly, he contends that the notice provisions of the IAD, and therefore the “speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6169 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Townsend
. Accordingly, he contends that the notice provisions of the IAD, and therefore the “speedy trial” provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6169 - 2017-09-19
. Accordingly, he contends that the notice provisions of the IAD, and therefore the “speedy trial” provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6169 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a speedy trial. As appellate counsel points out, trial counsel did request a speedy trial. Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138014 - 2017-09-21
a speedy trial. As appellate counsel points out, trial counsel did request a speedy trial. Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138014 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph P. Bury
are not prejudiced, including the right to notice, speedy trial and the opportunity to defend.” Whitaker v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2285 - 2017-09-19
are not prejudiced, including the right to notice, speedy trial and the opportunity to defend.” Whitaker v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2285 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joseph P. Bury
are not prejudiced, including the right to notice, speedy trial and the opportunity to defend.” Whitaker v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2285 - 2005-03-31
are not prejudiced, including the right to notice, speedy trial and the opportunity to defend.” Whitaker v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2285 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of events also violated his right to a speedy trial and that counsel provided ineffective assistance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111436 - 2017-09-21
of events also violated his right to a speedy trial and that counsel provided ineffective assistance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111436 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a violation of the constitutional right to a speedy trial. Double jeopardy did not attach here. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675322 - 2023-07-05
of a violation of the constitutional right to a speedy trial. Double jeopardy did not attach here. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675322 - 2023-07-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on August 25, 2022, after Bent filed a speedy trial demand. The transcript of that hearing does not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
on August 25, 2022, after Bent filed a speedy trial demand. The transcript of that hearing does not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on August 25, 2022, after Bent filed a speedy trial demand. The transcript of that hearing does not show
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
on August 25, 2022, after Bent filed a speedy trial demand. The transcript of that hearing does not show
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was ineffective for not ensuring that Rogstad was given a speedy trial. But, any violation of Rogstad’s right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155646 - 2017-09-21
was ineffective for not ensuring that Rogstad was given a speedy trial. But, any violation of Rogstad’s right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155646 - 2017-09-21