Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5801 - 5810 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 5801 - 5810 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, appeals the order denying his postconviction motion seeking to vacate his conviction for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80607 - 2014-09-15
, appeals the order denying his postconviction motion seeking to vacate his conviction for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80607 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the court’s denial of Johnson’s suppression motion, sentencing, or to a claim of a double jeopardy violation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256595 - 2020-03-12
, the court’s denial of Johnson’s suppression motion, sentencing, or to a claim of a double jeopardy violation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256595 - 2020-03-12
Norman W. Jahn v. City of Shawano
releases. (5) The parties will issue a joint press release, the terms to be agreed upon later. (6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15680 - 2005-03-31
releases. (5) The parties will issue a joint press release, the terms to be agreed upon later. (6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15680 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a motion for summary judgment on the declaratory judgment claim and on all of Martin’s remaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96546 - 2013-05-08
filed a motion for summary judgment on the declaratory judgment claim and on all of Martin’s remaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96546 - 2013-05-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reconsideration motion. Miller argues that his consent for a blood draw was coerced and involuntary. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465853 - 2021-12-21
reconsideration motion. Miller argues that his consent for a blood draw was coerced and involuntary. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465853 - 2021-12-21
State v. Cain Wiskow
suppression motion because a warrantless search of his room violated his Fourth Amendment rights. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3949 - 2005-03-31
suppression motion because a warrantless search of his room violated his Fourth Amendment rights. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3949 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Norman W. Jahn v. City of Shawano
) The parties will issue a joint press release, the terms to be agreed upon later. (6) The City and its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15680 - 2017-09-21
) The parties will issue a joint press release, the terms to be agreed upon later. (6) The City and its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15680 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case began when Woodville filed a second amended motion seeking to hold both Dykstra and Kevin Olson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210930 - 2018-04-10
in this case began when Woodville filed a second amended motion seeking to hold both Dykstra and Kevin Olson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210930 - 2018-04-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on chain of custody. He contends a chain of custody instruction was necessary because: (1) police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75723 - 2014-09-15
on chain of custody. He contends a chain of custody instruction was necessary because: (1) police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75723 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
entered against him. He argues on appeal that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31769 - 2008-02-11
entered against him. He argues on appeal that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31769 - 2008-02-11