Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5801 - 5810 of 39047 for probate forms.
Search results 5801 - 5810 of 39047 for probate forms.
Ronald E. Patten v. David H. Schwarz
. PER CURIAM. Ronald Patten appeals an order affirming the revocation of his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13106 - 2005-03-31
. PER CURIAM. Ronald Patten appeals an order affirming the revocation of his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13106 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Crowe’s probation. Crowe was advised of his right to file a response, but he has not responded. Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249625 - 2019-11-05
of Crowe’s probation. Crowe was advised of his right to file a response, but he has not responded. Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249625 - 2019-11-05
State v. Charles Barnes
one year juvenile probation for possessing a handgun as a result of this incident. The jury convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9311 - 2005-03-31
one year juvenile probation for possessing a handgun as a result of this incident. The jury convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9311 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles Barnes
witnesses: Brown, Correa and Cathey. Cathey had already received one year juvenile probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9311 - 2017-09-19
witnesses: Brown, Correa and Cathey. Cathey had already received one year juvenile probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9311 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Loren L. Leiser
) present crucial testimony; (2) object to identically- worded instructions and verdict forms; and (3) ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2108 - 2017-09-19
) present crucial testimony; (2) object to identically- worded instructions and verdict forms; and (3) ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2108 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. George Garcia
incarceration after revoking his probation that was imposed following his conviction of being a felon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9194 - 2017-09-19
incarceration after revoking his probation that was imposed following his conviction of being a felon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9194 - 2017-09-19
Robert Garel v. Michael Sullivan
of his probation and parole revocations.[1] Garel was assigned to the Department of Intensive Sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10515 - 2005-03-31
of his probation and parole revocations.[1] Garel was assigned to the Department of Intensive Sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10515 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert Garel v. Michael Sullivan
for certiorari review of his probation and parole revocations.1 Garel was assigned to the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10515 - 2017-09-20
for certiorari review of his probation and parole revocations.1 Garel was assigned to the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10515 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing him after revocation of his probation. Appellate counsel, Vicki Zick,1 has filed a no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=712544 - 2023-10-11
sentencing him after revocation of his probation. Appellate counsel, Vicki Zick,1 has filed a no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=712544 - 2023-10-11
State v. George Garcia
sentenced Garcia to two years incarceration after revoking his probation that was imposed following his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9194 - 2005-03-31
sentenced Garcia to two years incarceration after revoking his probation that was imposed following his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9194 - 2005-03-31