Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58021 - 58030 of 67987 for law.

[PDF] Raymond Henrich v. Town of Lyons
it acted according to law; (3) whether its action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9643 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Rudy Treml v. Eugene Zwisler
de novo was a correct application of the law. ¶9 Treml admitted that he had made a mistake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3691 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] John M. O'Neill v. Indian Hills First Addition Association, Inc.
researching the facts and law relating to the claim and correspondence with O’Neill regarding the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13270 - 2017-09-21

State v. Amanda L. Gear
requires that the trial court rely on facts of record and the applicable law to reach a reasonable decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6275 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
choices made after thorough investigation of the law and facts are virtually unchallengeable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32629 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and underlying law, could reach the same conclusion.’” State v. C.G., 2021 WI App 11, ¶11, 396 Wis. 2d 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504338 - 2022-04-05

[PDF] State v. William D. Shaw
law enforcement officer. At trial, Shaw asserted the affirmative defense of a reasonable fear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11301 - 2017-09-19

Janice E. Sieger v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
disallowed the use of sick leave when her former brother-in-law was murdered. That decision was later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12539 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain a jury’s verdict is a question of law. State v. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99747 - 2013-07-22

Shanna Marie Van Dyn Hoven v. Pekin Insurance Company
presents a question of law that we review independently. Smith v. Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co., 155 Wis. 2d 808
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5043 - 2005-03-31