Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5811 - 5820 of 9176 for op.
Search results 5811 - 5820 of 9176 for op.
COURT OF APPEALS
, No. 02–2283, unpublished slip op. at 2 (WI App Oct. 27, 2003). ¶4 After the Wisconsin supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29782 - 2007-07-23
, No. 02–2283, unpublished slip op. at 2 (WI App Oct. 27, 2003). ¶4 After the Wisconsin supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29782 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, No. 2012AP2795-CRNM, unpublished op. and order (WI App July 15, 2015). This court affirmed the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248643 - 2019-10-15
, No. 2012AP2795-CRNM, unpublished op. and order (WI App July 15, 2015). This court affirmed the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248643 - 2019-10-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, No. 2022AP374-CRNM, unpublished op. and order (WI App June 23, 2023). During the course of that proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768603 - 2024-02-27
, No. 2022AP374-CRNM, unpublished op. and order (WI App June 23, 2023). During the course of that proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768603 - 2024-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS
, No. 2012AP2700, unpublished slip op. (WI App June 20, 2013). ¶11 While we agree that Moser can properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105852 - 2013-12-18
, No. 2012AP2700, unpublished slip op. (WI App June 20, 2013). ¶11 While we agree that Moser can properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105852 - 2013-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stokes, No. 2008AP721-CRNM, unpublished slip op. (May 5, 2009). On March 9, 2015, Stokes filed a pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170585 - 2017-09-21
. Stokes, No. 2008AP721-CRNM, unpublished slip op. (May 5, 2009). On March 9, 2015, Stokes filed a pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170585 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
slip op. at 2 (WI App Feb. 19, 2002) (“Wimpie I”). ¶3 We rejected variations of the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27185 - 2014-09-15
slip op. at 2 (WI App Feb. 19, 2002) (“Wimpie I”). ¶3 We rejected variations of the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27185 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
State v. Goodman, No. 2005AP521-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App __). Because Staten and Goodman were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28688 - 2007-04-16
State v. Goodman, No. 2005AP521-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App __). Because Staten and Goodman were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28688 - 2007-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
of facts and law. See State v. Staten, No. 2005AP827-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App __). Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28683 - 2007-04-16
of facts and law. See State v. Staten, No. 2005AP827-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App __). Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28683 - 2007-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Troy H., Nos. 2012AP2525 and 2112AP2526, unpublished slip op. ¶9 (WI App Feb. 19, 2013) (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625286 - 2023-02-23
. Troy H., Nos. 2012AP2525 and 2112AP2526, unpublished slip op. ¶9 (WI App Feb. 19, 2013) (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625286 - 2023-02-23
State v. Dennis E. Jones
, unpublished slip op. (Ct. App. June 17, 1998). We concluded that the evidence was sufficient to sustain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24709 - 2006-04-04
, unpublished slip op. (Ct. App. June 17, 1998). We concluded that the evidence was sufficient to sustain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24709 - 2006-04-04