Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5811 - 5820 of 19926 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".
Search results 5811 - 5820 of 19926 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".
CA Blank Order
be presented by three appeals recently docketed in this court.[3] The no-merit report does not discuss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131951 - 2014-12-22
be presented by three appeals recently docketed in this court.[3] The no-merit report does not discuss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131951 - 2014-12-22
CA Blank Order
by April 12, 2012. However, the docket entries indicate[2] that during the initial appearance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102475 - 2013-09-25
by April 12, 2012. However, the docket entries indicate[2] that during the initial appearance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102475 - 2013-09-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of that hearing. The circuit court docket entries show that there was a “final pre-trial” held that day
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293133 - 2020-10-01
of that hearing. The circuit court docket entries show that there was a “final pre-trial” held that day
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293133 - 2020-10-01
State v. Julie Dixon
the judgment in the judgment and lien docket.” Section 973.09(3)(b), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13355 - 2005-03-31
the judgment in the judgment and lien docket.” Section 973.09(3)(b), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13355 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Electronic circuit court docket entries indicate that, at the hearing, the court heard arguments from both
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027880 - 2025-10-23
. Electronic circuit court docket entries indicate that, at the hearing, the court heard arguments from both
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027880 - 2025-10-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Electronic circuit court docket entries indicate that, at the hearing, the court heard arguments from both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027880 - 2025-10-23
. Electronic circuit court docket entries indicate that, at the hearing, the court heard arguments from both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027880 - 2025-10-23
CA Blank Order
recently docketed in this court.[3] The no-merit report does not discuss the imposition of the mandatory
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134592 - 2015-02-03
recently docketed in this court.[3] The no-merit report does not discuss the imposition of the mandatory
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134592 - 2015-02-03
City of Sheboygan v. Korry L. Ardell
disposition of a traffic regulation case must be filed within ninety days of the docket entry confirming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19570 - 2005-09-13
disposition of a traffic regulation case must be filed within ninety days of the docket entry confirming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19570 - 2005-09-13
State v. Darwin D. Hoye
, 123, 332 N.W.2d 744 (1983). And, he waived any claim that the State violated the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3653 - 2005-03-31
, 123, 332 N.W.2d 744 (1983). And, he waived any claim that the State violated the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3653 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Reuben Adams v. Phil Macht
, 388 (1983). Reviewing Adams’s complaint in this manner, we believe that he has raised an additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14931 - 2017-09-21
, 388 (1983). Reviewing Adams’s complaint in this manner, we believe that he has raised an additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14931 - 2017-09-21